Do Virtual Particle Pairs Radiate Energy as Gamma Rays or Repay Borrowed Energy?

alpha_wolf
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
When a vritual particle pair anihilates, does the energy radiate away in the form of gamma rays, or is it simply used to "repay the debt" of whatever energy that was borrowed to create those particles in the first place? I would assume the latter, but I would like a confirmation on that. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are probably thinking of Feynman diagrams involving loops of virtual particles. IMO virtual particles have no physical existence, so they can't possibly annihilate to real particles.
Suppose you are thinking of a diagram in 2nd order QED, in which the intermediate photon momentarily splits into an electron/positron pair. The pair's effect is to modify the photon propagator (as well as introduce renormalization into the diagram)
You might also think of a diagram where one of the electrons emits a photon, then exchanges another photon with whatever is on the other side of the picture, then reabsorbs the first photon. This modifies some other property of the electron to second order.
Either way, it's better to think of their energy being returned to the vacuum (which is somewhat misleading), rather than having them annihilate to real particles - the latter is patently impossible.
 
zefram_c said:
The pair's effect is to modify the photon propagator (as well as introduce renormalization into the diagram)
Either way, it's better to think of their energy being returned to the vacuum (which is somewhat misleading), rather than having them annihilate to real particles - the latter is patently impossible.


Yes in QFT this effect is also called the vacuum polarization and one has to introduce the polariztion-insertion into the foton propagator. it is the self-energy of the foton propagator and the main fysical consequence is that the vacuum is replaced by some kind of dielectricum, which is able to influence elektromagnetic-interactions going on.

Virtual particles are also the counterterm to the infinities of the bare particles. So the total adds up to a finit value. dressed particles = bare particle + cloud of virtual particles. Self energy express to what extent a bare particle is able to make some of these virtual particles real and by doing so energy-conservation is violated.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top