Do Different Observers See Different Entangled States in Quantum Mechanics?

  • I
  • Thread starter Robert Shaw
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Quantum
In summary: It's impossible for Alice and Bob to be in two maximally entangled spin-1/2 particles states simultaneously.So, if you have two maximally entangled spin-1/2 particles, the state is described as being in a superposition of two states, one with each particle in a different position, but they can't be in the same state simultaneously.In summary, Alice and Bob see states in a toy quantum Universe as separable or entangled, while Ylc and Zog see them as maximally entangled. However, the inconsistency between the two groups of observers is allowed in quantum mechanics.
  • #1
Robert Shaw
64
6
Alice and Bob are partial observers of states in a toy quantum Universe and widely discussed in the literature of Quantum Mechanics.

They see some states as separable and others as entangled. For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).

Martians Ylc and Zog see the world differently. For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.

A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

This inconsistency between earthpersons and martians seems to be allowed in quantum mechanics.

Unless we invoke a rule that earthpersons cannot communicate with martians.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"Quantum theory is a procedure by which scientists predict probabilities that measurements of specified kinds will yield results of specified kinds in situations of specified kinds. It is applied in circumstances that are described by saying that a certain physical system is first prepared in a specified manner and is later examined in a specified manner."

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/stapp/Copenhagen_Interpretation.pdf

So, you must first specify how exactly the measurement is performed, on Earth or Mars, and only after that apply any QM.

 
  • Like
Likes Robert Shaw
  • #3
AlexCaledin said:
"Quantum theory is a procedure by which scientists predict probabilities that measurements of specified kinds will yield results of specified kinds in situations of specified kinds. It is applied in circumstances that are described by saying that a certain physical system is first prepared in a specified manner and is later examined in a specified manner."

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/stapp/Copenhagen_Interpretation.pdf

So, you must first specify how exactly the measurement is performed, on Earth or Mars, and only after that apply any QM.

I think I like your answer, but I have doubts that you haven't addressed.

The term "specified manner" sounds reasonable and reassuring but is actually vague.

"I bought it at Aldi" so it's been prepared in a "specific manner".

"I weighed it on my bathroom scales" so it's been measured in a "specified manner".

Specifying the manner of preparation and measurement does not yield good physics.

We need to do more than "specify the manner"...

...but what more do we need!
 
  • Like
Likes AlexCaledin
  • #4
Robert Shaw said:
For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).
For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.
Where did you get this from? Some reference? Some calculation which you can present here?
 
  • #5
Robert Shaw said:
A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

Please show your work. As far as I know this is impossible; whether or not a state is entangled is an invariant property of the state, independent of who is observing it.
 
  • #6
Robert Shaw said:
Alice and Bob are partial observers of states in a toy quantum Universe and widely discussed in the literature of Quantum Mechanics.

They see some states as separable and others as entangled. For Alice the partial measurement suboperator is diag(1,1,-1,-1) and Bob is diag(1,-1,1,-1).

Martians Ylc and Zog see the world differently. For Ylc adiag(1,1,1,1) and Zog adiag(1,-1,-1,1) ...antidiagonal matrices. Their eigenvectors are the maximally entangled states for Alice and Bob.

A state is prepared which is observed by Alice and Bob to be separable.

Ylc and Zog observe the same state and find it to be entangled.

This inconsistency between earthpersons and martians seems to be allowed in quantum mechanics.

Unless we invoke a rule that earthpersons cannot communicate with martians.

I don't understand exactly what you're claiming here. Can we use the more traditional Dirac notation for entangled states?

If you have two maximally entangled spin-1/2 particles, then they can be described as being in the composite state:

[itex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} ( |u_z\rangle |d_z\rangle - |d_z\rangle |u_z\rangle)[/itex]

So that's a superposition of two states:
  1. [itex]|u_z\rangle |d_z\rangle[/itex], in which the first particle is spin-up in the z-direction, and the other particle is spin-down
  2. [itex]|d_z\rangle |u_z\rangle[/itex], in which the first particle is spin-down in the z-direction, and the other particle is spin-up
(Choosing any other direction leads to the same composite state, if the total spin is zero)

So what do you mean by saying that it's entangled for the Earthlings, but not the extraterrestrials, or vice-versa?
 

1. What is quantum censorship?

Quantum censorship is a theory in quantum physics that suggests that certain information cannot be observed or measured due to the inherent limitations of the universe.

2. Why do we need quantum censorship?

Quantum censorship is necessary to maintain the integrity of quantum systems and protect them from external interference or measurement. Without it, the delicate and unpredictable nature of quantum particles could be compromised.

3. How does quantum censorship work?

Quantum censorship works by preventing any external observation or measurement from affecting the state of a quantum system. This is achieved through various methods such as entanglement, decoherence, and quantum error correction.

4. What are the potential applications of quantum censorship?

Quantum censorship has potential applications in quantum computing, quantum cryptography, and quantum communication. It can also help in understanding the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and improving our understanding of the universe.

5. Are there any drawbacks to implementing quantum censorship?

One potential drawback is that quantum censorship could limit the amount of information that can be obtained from a quantum system, making it more difficult to study and understand. It also adds complexity to experiments and technological applications. However, the benefits of maintaining the integrity of quantum systems outweigh these drawbacks.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
643
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
989
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
649
Replies
1
Views
823
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Back
Top