Does a Charge on a Closed Surface Contribute to Electric Flux?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lugita15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law states that the electric flux through a closed surface equals the enclosed charge divided by epsilon_0, excluding external charges. The discussion raises the question of whether a charge located exactly on the surface counts as enclosed. It is clarified that, by definition, only charges fully enclosed by the surface are considered, meaning surface charges do not contribute to the flux. Additionally, if a charge is on the surface, the electric field at that point becomes undefined, complicating the application of Gauss's theorem. Therefore, charges on the surface do not create nonzero flux through the closed surface.
lugita15
Messages
1,553
Reaction score
15
According to Gauss's Law, the electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed by the surface divided by epsilon_0. This obviously excludes charges outside the surface. But what about *on* the surface? That is, it lies neither inside nor outside. Does this charge count as being "enclosed" in the sense of Gauss's Law? In other words, does the electric field of a charge "on" a closed surface create a nonzero flux through the surface?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lugita15 said:
According to Gauss's Law, the electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed by the surface divided by epsilon_0. This obviously excludes charges outside the surface. But what about *on* the surface? That is, it lies neither inside nor outside. Does this charge count as being "enclosed" in the sense of Gauss's Law? In other words, does the electric field of a charge "on" a closed surface create a nonzero flux through the surface?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You in Advance.

I believe by definition all charge must be enclosed, therefore there is no surface charge.
 
A Gaussian surface is a mathematical surface you decide on.
To apply Gauss's theorem, you must choose a surface that has charge either within or without, but not on your Gaussian surfce.
 
If a charge was on the surface, the flux would be undefined at that point (since the field itself is undefined at the charge itself)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top