Does a Charged Rod Repel More Strongly Than a Point Charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcfor3ver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
AI Thread Summary
A charged rod with +2Q will repel a +q charge more strongly than a +2Q point charge when both are placed at the same distance d due to the rod's ability to exert force in both x and y components. The discussion highlights that the rod can be considered as composed of many point charges, which leads to some force contributions canceling out due to their vector nature. In contrast, two point charges do not experience this cancellation, resulting in a straightforward calculation of force. The force on the +q charge from the rod is influenced by the distribution of charge along its length, while the point charges exert a direct force without such complexities. Ultimately, the rod's geometry and charge distribution play a crucial role in determining the strength of the repulsive force.
jcfor3ver
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
HELP PLEASE! A pt charge question.

Homework Statement


Would a rod with +2Q charge repel a +q charge (placed a distance d from the center of the rod) more than a +2Q point charge repelling a +q charge (same distance away as the rod charge) ?


Homework Equations


Eforce=k(q1)(q2)/d^2

Efield of rod = (1/4pi*(epsilonsubnot which = 8.85*10^-12))* (magnitude of q/d*sqrt(d^2+(L/2)^2))


The Attempt at a Solution



I would think so since the rod is acting on the point charge in both y and x components.

Also, would the same rod from above, repel the same +q charge more than an arced rod with the same scenario (equidistant d from the center)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I would think about it like this.
Think of the rod as made of tiny point charges. When you make a vector sum of all of the force contributions made by all of the point charges, won't some parts of the contributions cancel? Think about the components of the force vectors that are parallel to the rod.

In the case of two point charges, there will be no canceling.
 


Let's reason this out. Consider point charges +2Q and +q separated by d. The force on +q is F0=k(2Q)q/d2. Now divide +2Q in two equal pieces and place them a distance x apart so that +q is on the perpendicular bisector of x.

Is the resultant force on +q greater than, equal to or smaller than F0?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top