Does a lever/fulcrum reaction demonstrate Newton 3rd Law?

AI Thread Summary
A lever and fulcrum reaction does not demonstrate Newton's Third Law in the straightforward manner suggested, as multiple force pairs are involved. The discussion emphasizes that Newton's Third Law relates to the conservation of momentum and is applicable in various mechanical contexts. It is noted that solving mechanics problems requires consideration of all three of Newton's laws, not just the third. The complexity of force interactions in a lever system illustrates the necessity of applying multiple principles of physics. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately analyzing mechanical systems.
jimmypantspants
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Say a lever is tilted on a fulcrum with an object on the side in contact with the floor, a mass falls onto the other side, causing the object to go flying. Does this demonstrate Action-reaction ? (action on the lever to action on the object)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. At least not in the way you seem to imply. There are seversl force pairs involved here.
 
Orodruin said:
No. At least not in the way you seem to imply. There are seversl force pairs involved here.
I agree. N3 refers to conservation of momentum. Third law pairs are present in more than one instance here - but, of course, they are to be found everywhere in mechanics.
I already commented in a recent thread on the same topic that N3 is not the only law that needs to be applied in solving Mechanics problems. Newton stated three laws and he would only have produced one if three were not needed.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top