Does a magnetic field occupy space?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic fields do occupy space in the sense that they are vector fields with energy density, allowing them to vary in direction and intensity across different locations. However, they do not occupy space in the same way physical objects, like bricks, do, as multiple magnetic fields can coexist in the same area without exclusion. The relationship between electric and magnetic fields is explained through Lorentz transformations, which connect them under the principles of special relativity. Photons are the carriers of electromagnetic forces, but this concept is more advanced than typical freshman physics. Ultimately, while magnetic fields exist in space, their nature is fundamentally different from that of solid objects.
rabcdred
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Do magnetic fields occupy space?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think the answer is no but I am having a terribly difficult time explaining why. All I have seen online is that like light, the magnetic field is composed of non-massive particles that act like an electromagnetic wave. Please provide me with a better explanation that this. Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Short answer is yes.

Magnetic fields are really Electric fields under a lorentz transformation. Don't worry about that now, when you take an upper level E&M course you'll learn about the connection between special relativity and magnetism.

The particles you're referring to are photons, and they are the "carriers" of the electromagnetic force, but that is a little advanced for a freshman physics course I think. The short answer is, magnetic fields are vector fields which posses an energy density, and thus occupy space.
 
The question is rather vague. Yes there has to be some space otherwise you can't even define them. They point in a particular direction, and they vary from one place to another. You can even say that the field lines repel each other, but that would be a bit colloquial.

But they DON'T occupy space in the sense that bricks do. You can't put two bricks in one place, but you can superimpose two magnetic fields in the same place to get a total magnetic field.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top