Does a photon have a width and height ?

Edi
Messages
176
Reaction score
1
So when thinking of a photon, we (at least I do) think of the picture, where is it shown as having literal height and width, but I know or at least I think I know, that the lines just represent the intensity/ strength of the E and M part of the wave, not the actual shape of the photon.
And it got me thinking - does the photon have an actual width and height? Yes, it has length - wavelength (what ever it is (?) ), but how about the other 2 dimensions? Does it even exist in other than one dimension?
Could the photons existence in only one dimension be the reason why it is the only thing, that can travel at the speed of light? And that other "things" a.k.a. particles, that exist in more dimension can not achieve that velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edi said:
So when thinking of a photon, we (at least I do) think of the picture, where is it shown as having literal height and width, but I know or at least I think I know, that the lines just represent the intensity/ strength of the E and M part of the wave, not the actual shape of the photon.
And it got me thinking - does the photon have an actual width and height? Yes, it has length - wavelength (what ever it is (?) ), but how about the other 2 dimensions? Does it even exist in other than one dimension?
Could the photons existence in only one dimension be the reason why it is the only thing, that can travel at the speed of light? And that other "things" a.k.a. particles, that exist in more dimension can not achieve that velocity?
It also has 2 other real parameters that represent the polarization.
 
Edi said:
does the photon have an actual width and height?

It may have, but it will not be constant in time.
 
arkajad said:
It may have, but it will not be constant in time.

Ah, no THAT is very interesting. Will have something to think about.
 
What is width and height in the microscopic scale? Photon is a pack of energy
 
Wouldn't Lorentz contraction shorten it's length in direction of travel to zero? So I would think a photon could only exist in 2 dimensions.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top