(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Does a subsequence only have to have "some" terms

This is an example from my text, which I do not understand.

Suppose (s_n)is a sequence of POSITIVE numbers such that inf{s_n | n in NaturalNumbers} = 0. The sequence need not converge or even be bounded , but it has a subsequence that converges monotonically.

They then give a recursive process on how to pick the elements of the subsequence. My problem is as follows. Suppose the sequence is:

s_n = (n - 10)^2

This is a shifted parabola (but sequence) that has an inf = 0. A subsequence must have infinite terms, correct? I can see how you can pick terms starting from the left hand side of the vertex, and pick a monotone decreasing terms up to the vertex (0, 0), but what about after that? s_n starts moving back up and goes to +infinity. So past a certain point, we can't pick anymore points off s_n for our subsequence and keep the monotonicity of it.

So what am I missing? Does a subsequence only have to have "some" terms from the main sequence it is a subsequence of?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Does a subsequence only have to have some terms

Loading...

Similar Threads - Does subsequence terms | Date |
---|---|

I What does normalizing a straight line mean? | Mar 12, 2018 |

I Why does this concavity function not work for this polar fun | Jan 26, 2018 |

I How does the Vector Laplacian come about? | Oct 29, 2017 |

B Why does this derivation fail? | May 28, 2017 |

Infinite sequences containing every possible subsequence | Feb 7, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**