Does a Tire's Point of Contact Have Zero Tangential Acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
A tire's point of contact with the ground has zero velocity relative to the ground, and at that instant, its tangential acceleration is also zero. This occurs because the point transitions from negative to positive acceleration as it moves through the contact point. The tangential acceleration is not zero relative to the center of the wheel, but it is zero when considering the fixed coordinate system of the ground. The discussion clarifies that the acceleration changes magnitude but equals zero at the moment of contact. Understanding this concept helps resolve confusion about the motion of the tire's contact point.
elyons
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
A car is moving foreword with a constant acceleration. I know the point of the tire in contact with the ground has a velocity of 0 (relative to the ground). Is the tangential acceleration at this point also zero? I came across an example problem in my text where this occurs and and it does not make sense to me conceptually. If someone could give me a brief explanation I would very much appreciate it. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the motion of the point of contact immediately before and immediately after it it makes contact?
 
So the acceleration hits zero because it is changing from negative to positive but has an identical magnitude on both side of the point of contact? So the point has a tangential acceleration relative to the center of the wheel just not to the ground?
 
elyons said:
So the acceleration hits zero because it is changing from negative to positive but has an identical magnitude on both side of the point of contact? So the point has a tangential acceleration relative to the center of the wheel just not to the ground?
What is changing from negative to positive?
 
The tangential acceleration in terms of a fixed coordinate system. The velocity is accelerated to 0 as a point on the tire approaches the point of contact on the ground and after it reaches the point it is accelerated positively to increase the velocity of that point again. So at the instant the point is in contact with the ground the acceleration is 0. Sorry if I am not explaining my question clearly but writing it out like this I think I have worked it out so this helped! Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top