B Does Acceleration Depend on Instantaneous Velocity Changes?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Carbon273
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Acceleration, whether average or instantaneous, is fundamentally dependent on changes in instantaneous velocity. Average acceleration is calculated as the change in velocity over a specific time interval, while instantaneous acceleration represents this change as the time interval approaches zero, effectively becoming the slope of the velocity versus time graph. The discussion highlights that many physics textbooks do not explicitly clarify this relationship, which can lead to confusion. The principles of differential calculus underpin this concept, emphasizing the importance of continuity and differentiability in physical relationships. Overall, understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate interpretations in physics.
Carbon273
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
This question is not really a problem but a conversation starter. I am studying physics for the fun of it and I do have a quick question. Does acceleration regardless if it is average or instantaneous depend upon the change in the instantaneous velocity? The reason I asked that is because most books that I have seen does not specify the velocity to being instantaneous (hence why I underlined it). Most books just say the change of velocity over time is the cause with no specification. I know this is nitpicky and an obvious question but it has been bothering me. Thanks for the help in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Carbon273 and welcome to PF.

Carbon273 said:
Does acceleration regardless if it is average or instantaneous depend upon the change in the instantaneous velocity?
Yes. Average acceleration is the change in velocity (final minus initial instantaneous velocity) divided by the time interval over which this change takes place. Instantaneous acceleration is the same ratio but in the limit that the time interval becomes infinitesimally small, i.e. it is the slope of the velocity vs. time graph at some specific time.
 
  • Like
Likes Carbon273 and Delta2
kuruman said:
Hi Carbon273 and welcome to PF.Yes. Average acceleration is the change in velocity (final minus initial instantaneous velocity) divided by the time interval over which this change takes place. Instantaneous acceleration is the same ratio but in the limit that the time interval becomes infinitesimally small, i.e. it is the slope of the velocity vs. time graph at some specific time.
That's interesting. Obviously, its an assumption the books wants you to have but clarification would help on their part. Thanks for the help.
 
kuruman said:
Instantaneous acceleration is the same ratio but in the limit that the time interval becomes infinitesimally small
This is the basis of differential calculus. It works for any relationship between variables where the function is "continuous and differentiable" within the limits you are considering. This actually means most basic ideas encountered in Physics except where the relationship 'goes to infinity' (very bad maths statement but it gives the message) or when there is a 'cusp' in the curve.
Whenever we do a set of measurements or spot calculations, we sort of assume that it's valid to draw a smooth curve through them and it's mostly ok for many Physics experiments. The magic word here is "LIMIT".
PS Phenomena involving Chaotic Behaviour cannot be treated this way because there is no continuous line relating Input and Output result.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top