Does an Electron Decrease Capacitor Voltage by Adding to Positive Charge?

AI Thread Summary
An electron introduced between charged capacitor plates moves toward the positive plate, contributing to the positive charge on that plate. The term "positive charge" refers to the net positive charge resulting from a deficiency of electrons compared to protons in the plate's structure. This deficiency creates an effective positive charge, which can be viewed as a missing electron. The presence of the electron decreases the overall voltage across the capacitor by altering the charge distribution. Understanding this concept clarifies how charge interactions influence capacitor behavior.
anhnha
Messages
179
Reaction score
1
I saw this section somewhere in the forum:

Picture 2 plates charged to a voltage V, w/ capacitance C. Of course Q = C*V. An electron is placed in between the plates & released, & it moves towards the positive plate. Said electron with its negative charge now adds to the positive charge already on the plate resulting in a decrease in the cap voltage.

Can you help me understand the bold part?
What does "positive charge" mean here? I think it should be "positive ion".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anhnha said:
I saw this section somewhere in the forum:

Picture 2 plates charged to a voltage V, w/ capacitance C. Of course Q = C*V. An electron is placed in between the plates & released, & it moves towards the positive plate. Said electron with its negative charge now adds to the positive charge already on the plate resulting in a decrease in the cap voltage.

Can you help me understand the bold part?
What does "positive charge" mean here? I think it should be "positive ion".

while that would be a specific example of how to get a positive charge, it is not the only way.
the plate is a solid lattice made up of protons and electrons.
to be positive, it must have fewer electrons than protons.
in the model being used here, the "missing electron" is treated as an isolated positive charge that is free to move around.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top