Schools Does an MA vs. MS in Math Affect PhD Prospects?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision to apply for a Master's program in Mathematics at SUNY Stony Brook, specifically questioning the implications of the program being designated as an MA instead of an MS. The individual expresses a desire to pursue a PhD in either math or physics but is hesitant about the potential perception of an MA as a "watered down" option. Concerns are raised about whether the MA program might focus more on coursework rather than research, which could impact future academic opportunities. The overarching goal is to ensure that the chosen program aligns with aspirations for a PhD and does not hinder academic progression.
AcidRainLiTE
Messages
89
Reaction score
2
I have a BS in Math and Physics, and want to go on to grad school. I am currently planning on applying to SUNY Stony Brook's math department and their physics department (for theoretical physics).

I ultimately want to get my PhD (though whether in math or physics I am not entirely sure--hence why I am currently going to apply to both programs). But I have recently been considering applying to their (stony brook's) Masters program in Math. I noticed, however, that their program is for an MA in math. Why an MA? It gives me a bit of hesitation. I would think it would be an MS.

Honestly, I don't really care what the letters say...I really just want to get onto studying more math. But since I ultimately want to do a PhD, I want to make sure I am not doing a 'watered down' masters or something and ensure that choosing the program doesn't look bad later on in my academic career.

Does anyone think the program being for an MA instead of an MS signifies anything I should be concerned about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
might be coursework only. . .
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top