Does anyone recognise this equation (Indicated mean pressure)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bsodmike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The equation for indicated mean pressure, P_i, includes variables such as q_C, which represents the heating value of the fuel, and \epsilon_{\text{Vi}}, likely indicating volumetric efficiency. The discussion clarifies that \lambda_{\text{tot}} is the fuel equivalence ratio, reflecting how rich or lean the engine runs, while the equation itself is not commonly presented in this expanded form. Participants note that the equation relates specifically to internal combustion engines rather than general thermodynamics. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these variables for characterizing engine performance effectively.
bsodmike
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have been reading some online papers and have been struggling with the following equation as the author seems to introduce it without much detail. Since my background is primarily in electronic engineering, it is quite possible that this could be one of the elementary equations in thermodynamics.

P_i=\dfrac{q_C}{\lambda_{\text{tot}}\alpha_{\text{st}}}\rho_C\epsilon_{\text{Vi}}\eta_i

What I know:
P_i: indicated mean pressure; This is OK!

\alpha_{\text{st}}: the ideal air-to-fuel ratio for gasoline; values vary between 14.3 and 14.8. This is also defined as the "stoichiometric air-fuel ratio"

\rho_C: compressor air density; This is OK! Standard value of 1.2 kg/m^3 is used.

\eta_i: Indicated efficiency, 0.38 is being used; This is OK!

Variables I have no idea about:
q_C: A value of 42.5\times10^6 is being used; have no idea.

\lambda_{\text{tot}}: relative air ratio, it seems 1.8 is a typical value for constant-pressure (pulse factor = 1) turbochargers??!?

\epsilon_{\text{Vi}: no clue! A value of 0.97 has been used. Seems it is a percentage of sorts, an efficiency may be. The subscript "i" is typically used to indicate the word 'indicated' but "Vi" is not making much sense.

Summary: Have you seen this equation before? Please let me know what \epsilon_{\text{Vi} and I would greatly appreciate if you can confirm the other variables and my guesses/suggestions.

Cheers
Mike!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have split the variables above into two sections: (1) the variables I have figured out and are certain of and (2) the variables that continue to elude me.

The two driving me up the wall are q_C and \epsilon_{\text{Vi}}. Really would be glad if someone could help. Thanks!
 
Indicated mean effective pressure.

evi is probably volumetric efficiency (hew well the cylinder fills)
Qc is the heating value of the fuel.
lambda is the fuel equivilance ratio. its the ratio of fuel air mix to stoichiometric fuel air mix. (another way of noting how ruch or lean the engine is running)

The equation is not commonly seen looking like that (its usually in a simplified form work per cycle / volume dispaced). In this case the auther has simply expanded it to include all the basic variables.

mep is not really a pressure per se. It's a method of characterising how well an engine is performing regardless of displacement. The higher the mep the better.This isn't general thermodynamics if its the equation I am thinking of. It's to do with internal combustion engines. What book is it?
 
Last edited:
xxChrisxx said:
evi is probably volumetric efficiency (hew well the cylinder fills)
Qc is the heating value of the fuel.
lambda is the fuel equivilance ratio. its the ratio of fuel air mix to stoichiometric fuel air mix. (another way of noting how ruch or lean the engine is running)

The equation is not commonly seen looking like that (its usually in a simplified form work per cycle / volume dispaced). In this case the auther has simply expanded it to include all the basic variables.

Is Qc the same as heat of combustion? This page lists a HHV value for diesel of 44.8 MJ/kg; considering the equation I've seen uses 42.5 MJ/kg, it explains the 10^6 factor!

xxChrisxx said:
This isn't general thermodynamics if its the equation I am thinking of. It's to do with internal combustion engines. What book is it?

You're right; I did look up some books and found equations in terms of work per cycle/volume displaced. It was an undergraduate draft report I was perusing, rather than a book. Referencing books didn't help of course for the reason you mentioned.

Thanks a lot for your explanation... I am very bad at letting things 'go' if I cannot understand something, and this would have continued to nag away at me :)

Cheers
Mike.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top