Does Changing Mass Affect Velocity and Momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HazelDryad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Momentum is defined as the product of mass and velocity (p = mv). If mass increases while momentum remains constant, velocity must decrease, and vice versa. An example illustrates that a car with a mass of 500 kg moving at 1 m/s has a momentum of 500 kg·m/s, which decreases to 450 kg·m/s at 0.9 m/s. Similarly, a bullet with a small mass moving at a high velocity demonstrates that even low mass can yield significant momentum. Therefore, changes in mass directly affect velocity and momentum when keeping momentum constant.
HazelDryad
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am a little confused about how momentum works.

If the mass were to increase, would the velocity also increase?
If the mass were to increase, would the momentum also increase?
If the mass was to decrease, would the velocity also decrease?
If the velocity was to increase, would the momentum also increase?

I was told that if mass were to decrease, then the velocity would actually increase. I'm not sure if this is true, so if someone could answer these questions, I'd appreciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there

Hope this is acurate, and might be worth double checking.

What I know is momentum = mass x velocity
Call momentum p

Lets take a car with mass 500kg movin at velocity 1m/s
p = m x v
= 500 x 1
= 500 kg.m/s

Now the same mass at a slower velocity of 0.9m/s
p = m x v
= 500 x 0.9
= 450 kg.m/s
here we have a decrease in p

Now let's look at a bullet with mass 5g moving at 400m/s
p = m x v
= 0.005 x 400
= 2 kg.m/s
So the the momentum is not great here
 
If you are keeping momentum constant, then, as the equation dictates, if mass goes down, velocity must go up. if velocity goes down, then mass must go up. once again, this is only if momentum is constant.

p=mv
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top