Does Changing the Moon's Volume Affect Its Revolution?

AI Thread Summary
Changing the Moon's volume while keeping its mass constant would not affect its gravitational attraction or revolution around the Earth, as the gravitational force between spherical objects behaves like that of point masses. The Shell Theorem supports this, indicating that the potential and force remain consistent regardless of volume changes. However, the Moon's tidal locking, which synchronizes its rotation with its orbit, could be influenced by changes in its radius and mass distribution. This tidal locking effect suggests that the Moon's near side is slightly more massive than its far side. Further insights from experts in Astronomy or Astrophysics could clarify the complexities of these interactions.
SidT
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let us consider the revolution of the moon around the Earth. If the moon was expanded like a balloon so that it had the same mass but different volume (and therefore lower density), would it effect the moon's revolution in any way?
I probably sound like a retard right now...:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For perfect spheres there wouldn't be a difference in gravitational attraction so the orbit would be the same I suppose.

It's easy to show that the potential of a spherical object is the same as the one of a point. I just did a calculation and apparently even the force on a homogeneous sphere due to a potential is the same as the force on a point particle with the same mass at the center of the sphere. So the gravitational attraction between spheres is the same as between points.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_theorem

But somehow there are also rotational effects which cause the moon to sync with the earth. Not exactly sure how that works, but a different radius would make a difference.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot. :)
 
Gerenuk said:
But somehow there are also rotational effects which cause the moon to sync with the earth. Not exactly sure how that works, but a different radius would make a difference.

The effect is called tide-lock. I'm certainly no expert, but it seems to me that it depends upon the distribution of mass within one or both of the component bodies. That would, for instance, imply that the near side of the moon is slightly more massive than the far side.
Best that one of the Astronomy or Astrophysics experts elaborate. You can also Google tidal lockage.
 
Back
Top