Does Chemical Reactions Affect Mass?

pixel01
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
Does mass of compounds change due to exothermic/endothermic chemical reactions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not the chemistry sub-forum *hint* ;-)
 
pixel01 said:
Does mass of compounds change due to exothermic/endothermic chemical reactions?

Yes but. The difference in mass is undetectable by almost all instruments.
 
malawi_glenn said:
This is not the chemistry sub-forum *hint* ;-)

Chemically, the answer is definitely NOT, that's why I ask here.
 
Well chemistry processes are that the electrons are chaning orbits, so that their binding energy is released or increased -> which influences the mass of the system under consideration. It is the EM- force analogy with fusion and fission in Nuclear physics.

But the binding energies of electrons in atoms and molecules are of the order eV (!) so it is very tiny mass defect, just as mathman said.
The binding energies in nuclei are of the order MeV, so there the consequenses are bigger.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top