I Does de Sitter Spacetime Have Flat Foliation?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter andrewkirk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat Spacetime
andrewkirk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
4,140
Reaction score
1,741
TL;DR Summary
de Sitter spacetime is curved despite containing no mass-energy, because of a positive cosmological constant. Does it have a foliation into spatially flat hypersurfaces though?
I was just reading about de Sitter space and the following question occurred to me:

de Sitter spacetime is curved despite containing no mass-energy, because it has a positive cosmological constant. Does it have a foliation into spatially flat, constant-time hypersurfaces though?

Maybe it's just me but I find interesting the question of whether space is curved as well as spacetime. I looked at a few articles on de Sitter spacetime but could not readily find the answer. I was hoping somebody who knows lots about de Sitter spacetimes could tell me.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wiki gives a conformally flat metric,. Which isn't quite what you're looking for, but might be of interest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=De_Sitter_space&oldid=961657095#Flat_slicing

If I'm reading the article correctly, the metric is something like

$$ds^2 = a(t) (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 - dt^2)$$

One non-general possibility for a(t) is 1/(1-t)^2.

I mashed this into GrTensor. Using the orthonormal basis dt/(1-t), dx/(1-t),dy/(1-t),dz/(1-t) , the computer calculates the Einstein tensor G in this basis as:

$$G_{\hat{a}\hat{b}} = \begin{bmatrix} 3&0&0&0\\0&-3&0&0\\0&0&-3&0\\0&0&0&-3 \end{bmatrix}$$

which looks right to me, a positive constant density and a negative diagonal pressure with the same absolute value. There is a glaring coordinate singularity at t=1.
 
  • Like
Likes andrewkirk
pervect said:
Wiki gives a conformally flat metric

This slicing isn't just conformally flat, it's flat. The constant time hypersurfaces are flat Euclidean 3-spaces.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
pervect said:
If I'm reading the article correctly

The line element for the flat slicing is

$$
ds^2 = - dt^2 + a^2(t) \left( dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 \right)
$$

Exactly as you'd expect for a flat slicing. The scale factor is ##a(t) = e^{t / \alpha}##, where ##\alpha## is related to the cosmological constant by ##\Lambda = 3 / \alpha^2##.

The article also mentions a conformally flat form of the line element, but that is not the flat slicing.
 
  • Like
Likes DifferentialGalois
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top