Does electric heating violates the laws of thermodynamics

AI Thread Summary
Electric heaters convert electrical energy into heat, achieving near 100% efficiency in this process, but this does not violate thermodynamic laws. While they operate at unity efficiency, they are not closed systems and typically lose significant heat to the environment. The discussion clarifies that electric heaters are not machines in the traditional sense, as their purpose is to generate waste heat rather than perform work. The distinction between efficiency and gain is emphasized, highlighting that while energy conversion is effective, mechanical losses still apply in different contexts. Overall, electric heating aligns with thermodynamic principles despite common misconceptions.
mkj
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hello,
we have learned that according to the laws of thermodynamics that the efficiency of any machine should be less than one because of the passive components in it. in an electric heating machine all the input electrical energy is converted to heat. Does this make the electrical heater as an efficiency 1 machine, and does this violates the laws of thermodynamics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No and no.

To go over-unity it would have to make more heat than the electrical energy supplied to it.

At unity does not violate the laws of thermodynamics: entropy is allowed to stay the same in a closed system.
(It follows that what you were told is not exactly true.)

An electric heater is seldom a closed system.
(Which is, in fact, what you were supposed to get from what you were told.)

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=500095

Technically a heater is a super-inefficient heat engine ... typically 90-99% of the heat goes to the exhaust. It so happens that we want this heat to warm us up.
 
Last edited:
An electric heater is not a machine. It just happens to be a device where you want waste heat. Think of it this way: if you use the heat to heat a boiler and turn a steam engine, then put a brake on it to dissipate the engine's mechanical energy, you'll have the same 100% efficiency of heat production using a 0% efficient steam engine.
 
in an electric heating machine all the input electrical energy is converted to heat.

That's analogous to saying: "all the gasoline used in an engine is converted to heat...and power"...ok, so what...it's an inexact statement and not necessarily a reflection of efficiency.
 
we have learned that according to the laws of thermodynamics that the efficiency of any machine should be less than one because of the passive components in it

Passive components.
mkj - do not mix up efficiency with gain.
A gearbox may have a gain in rpm or torque, but due to frictional losses, its efficiency will be less than 1 ( ie power out < power in ). And that is not a thermodynamic efficiency, but a mechanical efficiency.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top