Does entangled polarized photon get through filter?

entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
Suppose we have a creation point C where two entangled photons A en B are produced. 1m in the direction of A is a vertically polarized filter V. 2m in the direction of B is a horizontal polarized filter H.

Now, I understand that when photon A strikes filter V, it either gets blocked or gets through at a 50/50 rate. If, however, photon A gets through the filter, it becomes vertically filtered, and so is photon B. So photon B then gets blocked by filter H.

Now I wonder what happens if photon A gets blocked by filter V. Does photon B remain unpolarized, thereby retaining the 50/50 percent chance of getting blocked by filter H? So, is it possible that both photons get blocked at any given time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, their relationship guarantees that one will get through and one will not.

By the way: there is no experimental sense in which the order of the photons encountering their respective polarizing filters matters. Whether it is A's being 1 meter and B's being 2 meters away, or vice versa, outcomes appear the same.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
entropy1 said:
Now I wonder what happens if photon A gets blocked by filter V. Does photon B remain unpolarized, thereby retaining the 50/50 percent chance of getting blocked by filter H? So, is it possible that both photons get blocked at any given time?

No. A's interaction with the polarizer is: absorbed if horizontally polarized, transmitted if vertically polarized. That's sufficient to determine the polarization of both A and B after the interaction.
 
I have a problem with this thread: OP seems to assume initially unpolarized entangled photons (allthough the title of this thread seems to suggest otherwise), but the answers assume a kind of definite either vertical or horizontal polarization, don't they ?
 
Yes, my mistake (the title).
 
forcefield said:
I have a problem with this thread: OP seems to assume initially unpolarized entangled photons (allthough the title of this thread seems to suggest otherwise), but the answers assume a kind of definite either vertical or horizontal polarization, don't they ?

They only acquire that definite polarization when one of them encounters the polarizing filter, and then when we say "horizontal" or "vertical" we mean with respect to angle of the polarizer.

Any polarization state can be written as a superposition of horizontal and vertical polarization about any axis; interaction with a polarizer on a given axis causes the superposition to collapse to one of those two states.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top