Does Every Closed Form on U Being Exact Imply the Same for f(U)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rocket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Forms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around demonstrating that if every closed form on U is exact, the same holds for f(U) under a differentiable function f with a differentiable inverse. The hint suggests using the pullback of forms, specifically that if dw=0 and f^{\star}w = d\eta, then (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta can be analyzed. Participants express confusion about the relationship between closed forms and the pullback operation, particularly how to derive that f^{\star}w = d\eta. The conclusion emphasizes that showing (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta is closed will establish that every closed form on f(U) is also exact. Understanding the properties of pullbacks is crucial for progressing in this proof.
rocket
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
let f:U \rightarrow R^n be a differentiable function with a differentiable inverse f^{-1}: f(u) \rightarrow R^n. if every closed form on U is exact, show that the same is true for f(U).

Hint: if dw=0 and f^{\star}w = d\eta, consider (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta.
---------------------------------------------------

I'm not quite sure what the hint means or how to use it. is it true that f^{\star} is basically another way of writing a differential - eg. df? I didn't really get a clear definition of it in my text.

anyway here's my thoughts so far:

consider w as a form on U. suppose w is closed. then dw = 0. since every closed form on U is exact, then there exists a \eta on U such that w = d\eta.

but how is it that f^{\star}w = d\eta (given in the hint)? like, how is this relationship derived? if w = d\eta and also f^{\star}w = d\eta, then we have w = f^{\star}w? I find that really confusing, and I'm not sure how to continue the problem. Any help is greatly appreciated. thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm rusty on this stuff, but if w is a form on f(U), then w' = (f-1)*w is a form on U. Show that if w is closed, then so is w'. If w' is closed, then there is some h' such that w' = dh'. Try to use this to show that w is also exact. Perhaps you will find that w = d(f*h') or something like that.
 


The hint is referring to the pullback of forms under a differentiable map. The pullback of a form w on U by a differentiable map f is defined as f^{\star}w = w \circ f . In other words, it is the form obtained by applying f to the variables in w. So, if w = d\eta on U, then f^{\star}w = f^{\star}(d\eta) = d(f^{\star}\eta) (using the properties of the pullback operation).

Now, since f is a differentiable function with a differentiable inverse f^{-1}, we can also define the pullback of forms on f(U) using (f^{-1})^{\star}. So, if we have a form \eta on f(U), then the pullback of \eta by (f^{-1})^{\star} would be (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta.

Using the definition of the pullback, we can see that (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta = \eta \circ f^{-1}.

Now, going back to the hint, if we have dw = 0 and f^{\star}w = d\eta, then we can use the properties of the pullback to obtain (f^{-1})^{\star}dw = (f^{-1})^{\star}(0) = 0. Similarly, (f^{-1})^{\star}f^{\star}w = (f^{-1})^{\star}(d\eta) = d((f^{-1})^{\star}\eta) (using the properties of the pullback).

Therefore, if we can show that (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta is a closed form on U, then we have shown that every closed form on f(U) is exact.

To show that (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta is closed, we need to show that d((f^{-1})^{\star}\eta) = 0. But we already know that d\eta = w = (f^{-1})^{\star}f^{\star}w, so we can rewrite the equation as d((f^{-1})^{\star}\eta) = (f^{-1})^{\star}f^{\star}w.

Using the properties of the pullback, we
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top