"Does Finite Group Contain Subgroup of Index 2 if Element has Order 2?

ForMyThunder
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Is it true that if a finite group G contains a subgroup of index 2, then there is an element of G with order 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm thinking that if H is a subgroup of index 2, then H is normal in G. Then for all x in G, xH=Hx, so (xH)(Hx)=H and xHx=H. So x=x^-1 and x has order 2. Is this correct?
 
The statement is true. If G has finite order and a subgroup of index two, G must have even order by Lagrange's theorem. Then, you can easily prove there must exist an element which is its own inverse. In fact, this is a standard exercise in any text.

Regarding your proof: Is multiplication of a left coset by a right coset well defined? And why do you end up with H on the right side? Doing this assumes xx=e.
 
You're right.

But you have to have x^2 in H for all x not in H. (xH)(xH)=H because otherwise, it would be an identity: (xH)(xH)=(xH) and cancellation gives that x is in H.

I don't see any way to prove this.
 

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Thread 'Decomposition into irreps of compact Lie group'

When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Is G simple?Is G simple? A different approach using Sylow theorems
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Normalizer of a subgroup of prime index
Replies
6
Views
2K
A Difference Between Subgroup & Closed Subgroup of a Group
Replies
14
Views
3K
MHB Proving Finite Groups: A Contradiction in Subgroups - Hello! (Wave)
Replies
12
Views
3K
I Does associativity imply bijectivity in group operations?
Replies
38
Views
4K
MHB Question on subgroup and order of the elements
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Proving that a subgroup is normal
Replies
8
Views
3K
MHB Nontrivial Normal Subgroup in Finite Groups with Index Constraints?
Replies
1
Views
3K
A The Klein 4-group
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Why must the group N be finite in this result?
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top