Does Friedmann equation allow for complex scale factor?

Piano man
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Looking at the Friedmann equation
H^2=\left[\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right]^2=\frac{8\pi G\rho}{3}-\frac{kc^2}{a^2}

and considering positive curvature, then for the limit where the second term dominates, we're left with
\left[\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right]^2=-\frac{kc^2}{a^2}

This implies a complex scale factor, does it not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This implies a complex scale factor, does it not?
Either that, or it implies that the curvature in this limit is negative. Which is the case.
IMHO, the equation makes more sense if you rearrange it:
\frac{kc^2}{a^2}=\left[\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right]^2=\frac{8\pi G\rho}{3}-H^2
Read: Curvature = positive contribution from energy density - negative contribution from expansion.
 
Okay, so the curvature has a time dependence k=k(t)?
 
Right. For example, in a closed universe, it could be its radius.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top