Does Gravity Affect the Inertia Load in a Dual-Weight Pulley System?

AI Thread Summary
In a dual-weight pulley system with two 850 lb weights, the primary concern is calculating the required torque to move the system 40 inches in one second. The discussion centers on whether gravity affects the inertia load, with one party arguing that gravity reduces the load to 850 lbs, while the other asserts that both weights contribute to the inertia. The consensus is that gravity acts on both weights, meaning the inertia load should be considered as 1700 lbs. The friction in the system is also a factor, but the key focus remains on the inertia calculation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately designing the counterweight system.
CuriousAbout
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a counterweight system I am trying to develop. One of my associates and I are in disagreement over something though.

The system is simple, it is effectivly two 850 Lb weights connected together by a chain. The chain is suspended by two pulleys. One of the pulleys is connected to motor. I am trying to calculate the torque required to move the system 40 inches in 1 second.

I believe the only forces that I have to overcome is inertia due to acceleration and the system friction. Assuming there is no friction the inertia is all that is l have to overcome.

Here is my question: Is the inertia load 1700 Lbs or 850. My associate says gravity will remove one of the loads but if gravity acts on both weights shouldn't it cancel out?
 

Attachments

  • counterweight.jpg
    counterweight.jpg
    4.9 KB · Views: 495
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top