Does Heating a Battery Affect Its Weight and Energy Storage?

bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
I read in a book that as an object gains more energy that it gains more mass. That if an object heats up that it actually starts to get heavier. It said this has not been proven because it is several orders or magnitude away. Say you have a specific amount of energy in a battery in the form of electrons (what battery is used for). Then you have another battery that is dead with no electrons but is heated up with the same amount of energy. Shouldn't the two then be equal in weight according to this? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric energy is being confused for electrons. E=mc2 calls for a charged battery to weigh more than the same uncharged. Slightly irrelevant here is that the electrolyte can be seen to increase from the discharged to the charged state. Don't add water to an uncharged battery as it may overflow when charged. The energy is stored chemically and the mass change detection does not equate to the volume difference in the electrolyte. Discharging changes acid to water. Charging puts back the acidity, increasing the volume.

The instructor for the mine repair class on battery powered scoop cars told of the old grizzled Kentucky mine repairman. The instructor was showing how to detect a bad cell by difference in density with a hygrometer. The old boy said he done it different and showed him by putting his finger in the cell and tasting it he pronounced the cell "a mite weak." My class laughed and said that I would probably try that. I said I might but I would use my wheezer. The instructor thought I was being smart and asked how I would taste it. I looked at my boss and said I'd have him do the tastin'.
 
Last edited:
bassplayer142 said:
I read in a book that as an object gains more energy that it gains more mass. That if an object heats up that it actually starts to get heavier. It said this has not been proven because it is several orders or magnitude away. Say you have a specific amount of energy in a battery in the form of electrons (what battery is used for). Then you have another battery that is dead with no electrons but is heated up with the same amount of energy. Shouldn't the two then be equal in weight according to this? thanks

Yes, charging the battery or heating the battery are two ways to increase its internal energy and, therefore, it mass, according to E = mc^2.

Eugene.
 
Normally the heat will equalize to optimum levels in 8 hours for a 1200 amp hour lead acid battery after it has charged for 8 hours. The electro/chemical energy stored in the electrolyte will also dissipate, but at the rate of 3% to 20% a month. If the tops are dirty and sulfation present there the rate will be at the high end. But even a new battery when charged is internally discharging. Heat is not the desired energy that we want stored in the battery.
I've had to change the receptacle when loose cable connections cause heating when drawing the 1000 amps over a period of time. No way to disconnect the + and - cables from the cells. The receptacle connections were an inch apart. These batteries were 20,000 pound monsters. Small compared to submarines batteries, but cables there could be disconnected from the cells before working on them. No room for error. Boy I miss my old job. Like a sore wheezer.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top