Does Higgs Boson rule out spacetime curvature?

rafaelsoteldo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there:

I've learned that there's no such thing as gravity, just the curvature of spacetime that makes objects that are close to each other act like it existed.

Does Higgs Bossom discovery tell us that there is a gravity force after all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF,

rafaelsoteldo said:
Hi there:

I've learned that there's no such thing as gravity, just the curvature of spacetime that makes objects that are close to each other act like it existed.

Does Higgs Bossom discovery tell us that there is a gravity force after all?

No. Why do you think that it would?
 
After I submitted the question I realized that the question with the Higgs Boson was only talking about the property of mass, and it had nothing to do with the spacetme curvature and gravity.
I was reading a theory that said that mass was only a mass efect and that what curved the spacetime ocean was closed volumes.
Well, never mind the question.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top