Does Insulation Increase a Sphere's Surface Temperature During Cooling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JWS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooling Sphere
AI Thread Summary
Wrapping a heated steel sphere in insulation during cooling can affect its surface temperature. If insulated at an isothermal state, only the rate of cooling changes. However, if the sphere has already begun cooling, its surface may warm slightly due to reduced heat loss, especially if there is a significant temperature gradient. Despite this potential warming, the sphere will continue to lose energy overall. The discussion highlights the complexity of heat transfer and the varying interpretations among physicists.
JWS
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A solid steel sphere is heated to 150 deg F and allowed to cool in a room at 60 deg F. During cooling, the sphere is wrapped in insulation which is at room temperature before used. Will the surface of the metal sphere warm or will only the rate of cooling change?

Don't laugh, I've seen conflicting answers amongst even pHd physicists.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the sphere is insulated when at an isothermal state (I.E. before it's had a chance to cool at all yet), then only the rate of cooling will change. If the sphere is allowed to cool somewhat, and the sphere has a fairly low thermal conductivity relative to the convective heat transfer at the surface (such that there is a significant temperature gradient from the center of the sphere to the surface), the surface could indeed warm up immediately after insulation, as the slowed rate of cooling would allow the sphere's temperature to equalize somewhat. On the whole, though, the sphere will still be losing energy.
 
JWS said:
A solid steel sphere is heated to 150 deg F and allowed to cool in a room at 60 deg F. During cooling, the sphere is wrapped in insulation which is at room temperature before used. Will the surface of the metal sphere warm or will only the rate of cooling change?

Don't laugh, I've seen conflicting answers amongst even pHd physicists.

Welcome to the PF.

What are your thoughts on the question?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top