Does Interstellar Gas Affect Atmospheric Seeing in Ground-Based Observations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter omthegreat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atmospheric
AI Thread Summary
Interstellar gas has a negligible impact on atmospheric seeing in ground-based observations due to its low density and vast distances. The density of interstellar gas is significantly lower than that of Earth's atmosphere, making scattering effects minimal. While interstellar gas can distort the spectrum of light observed, known as "reddening," its contribution to seeing effects is not a major concern. The turbulence within interstellar clouds occurs on larger scales than the objects being studied, further diminishing any potential impact. Overall, ground-based observations are primarily affected by Earth's atmosphere rather than interstellar matter.
omthegreat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is probably a stupid question, but it has been bugging me.
We are severely limited in ground based observations due to atmospheric seeing effects distorting the image. Why then are we not concerned by the vast amounts of gas/planets/etc in the line of path to our source that should also introduce a seeing effect?
Is it just that the densities of these intervening gas clouds are so low that scattering is negligible and intervening planets are too small to have an impact?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • Stars, planets and all other dense objects are tiny compared to the empty space in between. If you look in a random direction in the sky, it is unlikely that any object is there (until you reach the CMB).
  • The further away a gas cloud is, the larger the volume where "your" light goes through. That makes small-scale effects negligible - apart from the atmosphere of earth.
  • With a typical density of something like 100 atoms/cm3, you need of the order of 100 000 to 1 million light years to get the same area density as our atmosphere.
 
We are concerned with the intermediary gas, but not with respect to seeing. The effect of interstellar gas basically distorting the spectrum we observe, calling the "reddening". I guess there could be seeing effects from the interstellar gas, but we are pretty far from that beeing a real concern, the turbulence in interstellar clouds is probably on much bigger scales than the apparent size of the objects we study.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top