Does it make sense scientifically and linguistically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grz
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a request for feedback on the scientific and linguistic accuracy of a report detailing high voltage and current tests conducted on a tent. The tests involved an impulse voltage generator and a high current generator, with results indicating high temperatures at connection points and melting stakes, suggesting significant electrical discharges. Participants provided minor corrections to the language used, emphasizing proper phrasing and common expressions. The conversation highlighted the collaborative spirit of the forum, with users appreciating the willingness to assist one another. Overall, the report effectively conveyed the technical findings while benefiting from community input on language clarity.
Grz
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Hello everyone,

I have an unusual request. Since I am not a native speaker of English, would you be willing to check if I didn't write something infinitely stupid? Do you notice anything that sounds strange/out-of-place/not English at all? Any missed articles? I would be really grateful for every comment.HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATOR

The tent underwent high voltage tests with discharges produced by an impulse voltage generator. An electrode imitating a tourist's head had been placed in the tent. The estimated voltage depended on the distance between the tent and the end of the electrode and varied between 400 kv and 1MV.

CURRENT GENERATOR TEST

High current generator was used to check the tent's durability. A series of electrical discharges with different peak current values were directed at the top of the frame of poles.

TESTS RESULTS

Where the pole segments connected to each other scorches could be noticed, which means that those points experienced very high temperatures. That is explained by their relativly high resistance. The stakes, which laid freely on the laboratory floor furing the tests, melted to some extend. Again, it suggests high temperatures generated at those points during discharges. A dramatic temperature increase in the short period of time resulted in sparks, i.e. particles of hot aluminum. The generated peak current was comparable to that occurring in a lightning – statistically, it varies between 30 and 40 kA, though higher values (more than 200 kA ) have been also reported.

 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Grz said:
CURRENT GENERATOR TEST

High current generator was used to check the tent's durability. A series of electrical discharges with different peak current values were directed at the top of the frame of poles.

Should be "A high current generator..."
 
I think you did it very well. Scorches is OK, but "some scorching" is the more common way to say it.
 
Minor corrections in bold, none technical. It was very well expressed.

HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATOR

The tent underwent high voltage tests with discharges produced by an impulse voltage generator. An electrode imitating a tourist's head was placed in the tent. The estimated voltage depended on the distance between the tent and the end of the electrode and was varied between 400 kv and 1MV.

CURRENT GENERATOR TEST

A High current generator was used to check the tent's durability. A series of electrical discharges with different peak current values were directed at the top of the tent poles.

TESTS RESULTS

Where the pole segments connected to each other scorches could be noticed, which means that those points experienced very high temperatures. That is explained by their relatively high resistance. The tent stakes, which laid freely on the laboratory floor during the tests, melted to some extent. Again, it suggests high temperatures generated at those points during the discharges. A dramatic temperature increase in the short period of time resulted in sparks, i.e. particles of hot aluminum. The generated peak current was comparable to that occurring in a lightning strike. Statistically, lightning strikes vary between 30 and 40 kA, though higher values (more than 200 kA ) have been also reported.
 
Thank you, Dr. Courtney and anorlunda. And special thanks to you, meBigGuy. The fact that complete strangers are eager to help complete strangers never ceases to amaze me.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Dr. Courtney
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top