Does it mean that as you increase the energy of a particle

Helicobacter
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Does it mean that as you increase the energy of a particle, its mass will increase? Or, that for any given particle there is a certain container of certain mass/energy and part of that quantity is allocated to energy and the other to mass. In the latter case, could you not make a transistor out of this where you encode 0/1 states to certain mass/energy distributions?

On an simple, intuitive level (I'm a physics layman):

Why does it happen to be related by exactly the speed of light squared?

How does this equation follow from the simple statement: The speed of light is the same in all inertial reference frames?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The equation comes in the form
<br /> E=\frac{m_0 c^2}{\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}}<br />
When things aren't moving, or are moving slowly this just becomes E=m_0 c^2. In general, it was considered as an answer to the question: "Does the inertia of a body, depend upon it's energy content?" But the idea of relativistic mass, mass that changes depending on velocity, is no longer in vogue.
 


WIKIPEDIA said:
Mass–energy equivalence does not imply that mass may be "converted" to energy, and indeed implies the opposite.

answers the first question
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top