Does J go to inf when v goes to c?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GiftOfPlasma
  • Start date Start date
GiftOfPlasma
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
In SR, does the current become infinite when the velocity of the charge approaches c?

I'm thinking it doesn't because of the SR Lagrangian for a charged particle:
L = -\frac{m c^{2}}{\gamma} - q \phi + q \vec{v} \cdot \vec{A}
doesn't have a gamma in the qv term.

Another way of putting this is: Does the four current equal the charge times the four velocity?

Thanks for your responses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi GiftOfPlasma! :wink:
GiftOfPlasma said:
Another way of putting this is: Does the four current equal the charge times the four velocity?

Yes. :smile:
 
So the Lagrangian should be:
L = -\frac{m c^{2}}{\gamma} - q \phi + q {\gamma} \vec{v} \cdot \vec{A}

Thanks,
 
GiftOfPlasma said:
So the Lagrangian should be:
L = -\frac{m c^{2}}{\gamma} - q \phi + q {\gamma} \vec{v} \cdot \vec{A}
No, it shouldn't. The original one is ok, but you've probably lost c somewhere. I do not know what you mean by 4-current... 4-current density? If so recall that the volume is also contracted is SR.
 
Ok, I think I see what is going on, the original Lagrangian is for a charged particle.
The classical particle is always a point, so it doesn't contract.
Furthermore, the number of particles in a volume is the same in all reference frames.
The volume is contracted with respect to an observer moving relative to the volume.
So the relativistic observer sees a higher charge density and current density than a non-relativistic observer.

I found a good explanation here:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/jk1/lectures/node16.html"

Thanks for the effort.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top