Does light have 2 electric field components?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Light indeed possesses two perpendicular electric field components, which can be visualized as two separate beams propagating through anisotropic materials at different speeds due to varying refractive indices. This phenomenon is crucial in understanding birefringence, where the electric field can be decomposed into two components at different angles, resulting in distinct phase differences in anisotropic media. The original wave is not physically separated but rather distorted by the medium's properties, complicating its propagation. This model aids in comprehending wave behavior in such contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Huygens' principle
  • Familiarity with birefringence and anisotropic materials
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Ability to visualize vector decomposition in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Birefringence in anisotropic materials" for practical applications
  • Study "Electromagnetic wave propagation in anisotropic media" for deeper insights
  • Explore "Vector decomposition in physics" to enhance visualization skills
  • Learn about "Phase differences in wave mechanics" for advanced understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the behavior of light in anisotropic materials will benefit from this discussion.

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
Hi, we are currently working on Huygens constructions and I'm having trouble visualising it. I understand that, say if a light wave is incident upon an anisotropic material that if you consider it's electric field going perperdicular in one direction it will be refracted differently than if you consider it's electric field perpendicular in another direction (due to the refractive index of the material effecting each perpendicular componant differently.)

My question is does light have 2 perpendicular components of electric field? so you would effectively have 2 beams going through the material at different speeds, due to one perpendicular componant of light being refracted more than the other? Or would you consider each perpendicular componant separately (i.e. it only has one at any time)?

Getting a bit lost with this!

Please see attached images, the dotted line is for one componant, the plane wave line is for the other perpendicular componant.

How do I visualise this?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    31.8 KB · Views: 667
  • Untitled2.jpg
    Untitled2.jpg
    10.6 KB · Views: 608
Physics news on Phys.org
rwooduk said:
My question is does light have 2 perpendicular components of electric field? so you would effectively have 2 beams going through the material at different speeds, due to one perpendicular componant of light being refracted more than the other?

Yes. You can use this to separate a single beam into two perpendicularly-polarized beams. See the images here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rwooduk
jtbell said:
Yes. You can use this to separate a single beam into two perpendicularly-polarized beams. See the images here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence
Thanks for the answer, but how would you visualise this? So the standard image (show below) is not correct?

light_magnetic.jpg


Maybe I'm confusing things, I'm trying to visualise a beam of light that has two perpendicular electric field componants, and i cant. I looked at the images on the wiki page, but where's the magnetic field?
 
Any vector can be decomposed into two perpendicular components. Like when you decompose the weight of a body into normal and tangential components on an inclined plane. It does not mean that the body has two weights, does it?
In the image the electric field is horizontal. You could decompose it into two components at 45 degree angles from horizontal (above and below horizontal plane). It's not an unique decomposition, for sure. Just an example. Then you can imagine two waves with propagating simultaneously, with the two electric field and the appropriate magnetic fields (B perpendicular to E in air or vacuum)
As long as the wave is in an isotropic medium, the two components have the same phase and you can (imaginary) put them together to obtain a wave with a single E component. In an anisotropic medium the two components will propagate with different speeds and a phase difference will appear.

Remember that this is just a model to help operate with waves in anisotropic medium. The wave is not actually "separated". The original plane or spherical wave is distorted due to the anisotropy of the medium and the propagation becomes more complicated. An easy way to describe what happens is to use this component model. Same as decomposing vectors or motion to do calculations does not mean that we actually have two "objects".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rwooduk
nasu said:
Any vector can be decomposed into two perpendicular components. Like when you decompose the weight of a body into normal and tangential components on an inclined plane. It does not mean that the body has two weights, does it?
In the image the electric field is horizontal. You could decompose it into two components at 45 degree angles from horizontal (above and below horizontal plane). It's not an unique decomposition, for sure. Just an example. Then you can imagine two waves with propagating simultaneously, with the two electric field and the appropriate magnetic fields (B perpendicular to E in air or vacuum)
As long as the wave is in an isotropic medium, the two components have the same phase and you can (imaginary) put them together to obtain a wave with a single E component. In an anisotropic medium the two components will propagate with different speeds and a phase difference will appear.

Remember that this is just a model to help operate with waves in anisotropic medium. The wave is not actually "separated". The original plane or spherical wave is distorted due to the anisotropy of the medium and the propagation becomes more complicated. An easy way to describe what happens is to use this component model. Same as decomposing vectors or motion to do calculations does not mean that we actually have two "objects".
Thanks, some very good analogies there! you really helped clear things up in my head! thankyou very much!
 
You are very welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K