Does Mass Really Change with Velocity Near the Speed of Light?

mike232
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,
I'm reading my modern physics book over break and I remember hearing that mass changes as you approach the speed of light. But is it really the mass that is changing or just the amount of momentum a certain mass can have. So is mass really varying or is it the energy capacity of mass that is changing with respect to velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mike232 said:
I remember hearing that mass changes as you approach the speed of light.

The "mass" that changes as your speed changes is more precisely termed "relativistic mass"; but that term is not used much in modern physics texts because it is just a synonym for "energy".

mike232 said:
is mass really varying or is it the energy capacity of mass that is changing with respect to velocity?

I'm not sure what you mean by "mass really varying" as opposed to just "energy capacity of mass" changing; if "mass" means "relativistic mass", then "mass" and "energy" are just different names for the same thing (see above).

OTOH, if "mass" means "rest mass", or better, "invariant mass", then it is an inherent property of the object and does not change as the object changes speed.
 
So by defining mass as simply confenced energy... I'm thinking of p=ymu. So because the variant mass is mass times 'demensionless velocity' the momentum increases differently than classic, the classic idea of mass changed but the rest mass, intrinsic energy of matter, doesn't change?
 
mike232 said:
by defining mass as simply confenced energy

Relativistic mass is the same as energy (not sure what you mean by "confenced"). Invariant mass is not. It's important to keep this in mind because the term "mass" and the symbol m won't always be explicitly defined as one or the other, you have to look at the context. See below.

mike232 said:
I'm thinking of p=ymu.

In this formula, m is invariant mass, not relativistic mass. So m in this formula is not the same as energy.

mike232 said:
because the variant mass is mass times 'demensionless velocity' the momentum increases differently than classic,

The momentum increases with velocity differently from the "classic" case (I assume by "classic" you mean "Newtonian") because of the factor ##\gamma##; you don't have to think of "variant mass" (by which I assume you mean "relativistic mass"--it really helps to keep your terminology consistent) at all.

mike232 said:
the classic idea of mass changed but the rest mass, intrinsic energy of matter, doesn't change?

What do you mean by "the classic idea of mass"?

As for rest mass, I'm not sure it is best thought of as "intrinsic energy of matter", because, as I noted above, invariant mass is not the same as energy.

It might help if you gave a specific quote from your book, or a specific example of a scenario you're not sure about.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top