Does n^n or a Complex Product Formula Grow Faster Asymptotically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the asymptotic growth of n^n and a complex product formula involving binomial coefficients. The conclusion drawn is that n^n appears to grow faster, particularly after evaluating the product formula which results in zero for certain conditions. However, there is a suggestion that the complex product may grow faster under different interpretations. The participants are analyzing the implications of these mathematical expressions on growth rates. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards n^n as the dominant growth function in this context.
Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
n^n

or

\prod_{r=0}^{n-1}\left(\begin{array}{c}\sum_{j\leq r}\left(\begin{array}{c}n\\ j\end{array}\right)\\2^r\end{array}\right)

Asymptotically, I mean.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since
\prod_{r=0}^{n-1}{{\sum_{j<r}{n\choose j}}\choose{2^r}}={0\choose1}\prod_{r=1}^{n-1}{{\sum_{j<r}{n\choose j}}\choose{2^r}}=0
I'd have to go with n^n.
 
How about now?
 
It seems that the product grows faster.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top