Does Newtons of an Egg drop vary accordingly to height?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Newton's laws to the physics of an egg drop, specifically questioning why an egg can survive a fall from a height of 2 cm but break from 2 meters despite the forces being theoretically similar. It highlights that while the force acting on the egg is constant (F=mg), the velocity and kinetic energy increase with height, leading to greater momentum upon impact. The key factor in whether the egg breaks is the rate of change of momentum when it hits the ground, which is influenced by the surface it lands on. A softer surface increases the time over which momentum changes, resulting in a smaller force and potentially preventing the egg from breaking. Ultimately, the outcome of the egg drop is determined by the interplay between height, impact velocity, and the nature of the surface.
derfee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
According to my knowledge, I am able to apply Newton's second law on an egg for an egg drop; the resulted force from that can would be the force which occurs when it hits the ground. That force would also be reflected when it hits the ground according to Newton's third law.

What is confusing me is that the same force occurs to a 2m drop and a 2cm drop; one breaks and one doesn't yet the forces are still the same?

I do not understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the egg is falling to the Earth there is constant force acting on the egg and the Earth F=mg=const. But as they close together they pick the same momentum each P=mv in different directions so the whole momentum of the system stays 0. So the speed of the egg is increasing. The movement of the Earth is negligible.
If you drop the egg form hight of 2 m it will have higher velocity than from 20 cm so bigger momentum and bigger kinetic energy.
When the egg hits the Earth the force with which the egg will act on the Earth will depend on the change of the momentum or in other words on how fast the speed will decrease over time ( F=dP/dt=m dv/dt ).
If the egg fall on something soft the time of change of the momentum will be bigger so the force will be smaller and maybe the egg won't break even from hight of 2 m.
 
vlado_skopsko said:
when the egg is falling to the Earth there is constant force acting on the egg and the Earth f=mg=const. But as they close together they pick the same momentum each p=mv in different directions so the whole momentum of the system stays 0. So the speed of the egg is increasing. The movement of the Earth is negligible.
If you drop the egg form hight of 2 m it will have higher velocity than from 20 cm so bigger momentum and bigger kinetic energy.
When the egg hits the Earth the force with which the egg will act on the Earth will depend on the change of the momentum or in other words on how fast the speed will decrease over time ( f=dp/dt=m dv/dt ).
If the egg fall on something soft the time of change of the momentum will be bigger so the force will be smaller and maybe the egg won't break even from hight of 2 m.

thanks!
 
No problem, I hope I helped a bit :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top