Does only the Tangential momentum count

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gmaximus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Count Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that when converting linear momentum to angular momentum, only the tangential component of the linear momentum contributes to the angular momentum about a fixed axis. A particle colliding tangentially with a rotating disc transfers all its momentum into angular momentum, while a collision at an angle results in a reduced contribution based on the cosine of that angle. The angular momentum of the system remains constant during the collision, regardless of the direction of the particle's motion. This understanding emphasizes the relationship between linear and angular momentum in rotational dynamics. The conversation effectively highlights the importance of the collision angle in determining the angular momentum generated.
Gmaximus
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Does only the Tangential momentum "count"...

When convertering the momentum from linear to angular?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a particle with linear momentum \vec p, its angular momentum about some origin is \vec L = \vec r \times \vec p. So, if I understand what you're asking, the answer is yes.
 
So a particle traveling into a disc (thats free to rotate) in an inelastic collision that collides on a path tangent to the disc has all of its momentum converted into angular momentum, whearas a path of 30° with respect to the tanget line would have cos(30) times that angular momentum?
 
I'd phrase it a bit differently. (As I don't like saying that linear momentum "converts" to angular momentum.) Let me assume that the axis of the disk is fixed; the disk is free to rotate, but not translate. In any case, prior to the collision the particle has a certain angular momentum with respect to that axis. Yes, the amount of angular momentum it has depends on its direction of motion. During the collision, the angular momentum (of the entire system) does not change. Does this help?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Angular momentum for a bullet and a rod attached to a ceiling
Replies
17
Views
1K
Angular Momentum Problem: Mouse walking on a rotating turntable
Replies
5
Views
1K
Is Linear Momentum Conserved in This Case? (sliding box hits a floor tile)
Replies
2
Views
859
Least count error Vs Least count
Replies
1
Views
2K
Which system to apply conservation of momentum to?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Ambiguous question on momentum and how it works...
Replies
13
Views
1K
A planet of mass M and an object of mass m
Replies
6
Views
1K
Angular momentum conservation on a merry-go-round
Replies
5
Views
2K
Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query
2
Replies
71
Views
2K
Final momentum of box with reflective interior hit by ideal laser
Replies
4
Views
885

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top