I Does plasma react to eletromotive force

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Scott 224
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Plasma
Scott 224
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded to post much more information when starting threads, including links to their reading so far.
Does plasma react to eletromotive force
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blood plasma ? :smile:

Or a different kind of plasma, consisting of ...

(ps what is eletromotive force ? I know a little about electromagnetic force)

[edit] PS2: hello Scott, :welcome:

[edit2]looked it up and it turns out to be a legal term :rolleyes: -- I just had it stored as 'emf' and the translation in my brain for this in the context of plasmas is 'electric force'.

Answer to your question is Yes

Now my question to you is: since you like brevity, would you have preferred a one word answer :wink: ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes davenn and berkeman
Scott 224 said:
Does plasma react to eletromotive force

You have a pattern of posting very terse questions and responses. Did you know that up till now, in all the 5 posts that you've made, none of them exceeded more than SEVEN words?

Why does this matter here? It matters because I do not know if YOU know what is a "plasma" and what is an "electromotive force". Before you ask if one affects the other, you need to first understand what each of them is. You did not indicate that you do, and if you do, you did not indicate why you don't know if one reacts to the other. This may reveal to us your level of understanding, and informs us at what level we can reply. It is of no use, and a waste of time, if we tell you an answer that is way over your head.

So if you wish to receive a clear, thoughtful answer, how about putting in a similar level of effort in your questions? And in this one post alone, I've written more than all of your posts combined.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, berkeman, Asymptotic and 1 other person
BvU said:
blood plasma ? :smile:

Or a different kind of plasma, consisting of ...

(ps what is eletromotive force ? I know a little about electromagnetic force)

[edit] PS2: hello Scott, :welcome:

[edit2]looked it up and it turns out to be a legal term :rolleyes: -- I just had it stored as 'emf' and the translation in my brain for this in the context of plasmas is 'electric force'.

Answer to your question is Yes

Now my question to you is: since you like brevity, would you have preferred a one word answer :wink: ?
ZapperZ said:
You have a pattern of posting very terse questions and responses. Did you know that up till now, in all the 5 posts that you've made, none of them exceeded more than SEVEN words?

Why does this matter here? It matters because I do not know if YOU know what is a "plasma" and what is an "electromotive force". Before you ask if one affects the other, you need to first understand what each of them is. You did not indicate that you do, and if you do, you did not indicate why you don't know if one reacts to the other. This may reveal to us your level of understanding, and informs us at what level we can reply. It is of no use, and a waste of time, if we tell you an answer that is way over your head.

So if you wish to receive a clear, thoughtful answer, how about putting in a similar level of effort in your questions? And in this one post alone, I've written more than all of your posts combined.

Zz.
All that I know about plasma is that it is ionized gas with no charge. Electromotive force is minus the change in electromagnetic flux divided by the change in time.
I asked a simple question, I would just like to know the answer no matter how complex it is. I couldn't find the answer anywhere else.
 
Scott 224 said:
no charge
no charge, no interaction
Scott 224 said:
change in electromagnetic flux
What is your picture of flux in connection with an infinitesimally sized constituent of plasma ?
Are you familiar with the laws of electromagnetism ?
Scott 224 said:
I couldn't find the answer anywhere else.
Poster has been reminded to post much more information when starting threads, including links to their reading so far.
If you tell us where you did look, we might be able to suggest alternative locations.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top