Does reflection accompany refraction in Snell's law?

AI Thread Summary
When an incident ray strikes an interface at an angle less than or equal to the Critical Angle, it is primarily refracted, but reflection also occurs. In optics, reflection is generally present unless the angle is at the Brewster angle with appropriate polarization. The discussion highlights that in the context of mechanical waves, such as those used in oil and gas exploration, reflection is likely to occur regardless of wave type or polarization. The conversation raises the question of whether a Brewster angle exists for mechanical waves in geological contexts. Overall, reflection accompanies refraction in Snell's Law applications across different wave types.
Seismic101
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If the the angle of incidence of an incident ray is less than (or equal to) the Critical Angle, the ray is refracted, but do we still get some reflection from this same incident ray?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Seismic101 said:
If the the angle of incidence of an incident ray is less than (or equal to) the Critical Angle, the ray is refracted, but do we still get some reflection from this same incident ray?
Hi Seismic101. :welcome:

Reflection like you see from a train window pane at night?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Hi Seismic101. :welcome:

Reflection like you see from a train window pane at night?

I am not sure. I wasn't really speaking about light although same principles apply, I guess? Please let me explain more.

In my field (O&G Exploration) we send vibrations into the Earth, and when this energy encounters the interface between Earth layers it follows Snell's Law. My question is: when the ray hits the interface at angle less than or equal to the Critical, we get refraction, but do we get some reflected rays as well?

I like the analogy you used! Thanks for the nice welcome!
 
Seismic101 said:
when the ray hits the interface at angle less than or equal to the Critical, we get refraction, but do we get some reflected rays as well?
In optics, when a ray of light hits an interface between two different media, reflection will always take place except for when the incident angle is equal to the Brewster angle and the incoming polarization lies in the incident plane. Since, the wave you are dealing with is of longitudinal waves where polarization is not relevant, I presume reflection will always take place regardless of any condition of the system.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Since, the wave you are dealing with is of longitudinal waves where polarization is not relevant
The vibrations (mechanical waves) we send into the Earth can be longitudinal (particle motion in the direction of wave propagation) or transverse (particle motion is perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation).

blue_leaf77 said:
except for when the incident angle is equal to the Brewster angle and the incoming polarization lies in the incident plane
Do you think this is true for any medium/ wave type? In other words, do you think there is a Brewster angle in the case of mechanical waves propagating through Earth layers?

Thanks for taking the time to reply.
 
maybe this will help ?

Seismic_Reflection_Principal.png

cheers
Dave
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
898
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top