A Does spacetime lose its determinism in third dimension?

The Count
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
In a lecture from a course in QM, it was mentioned that Shroedinger's equation is deterministic in one and two dimensions. But in third dimension it gives unstable solutions, loosing it's determinism.

It was mentioned that "in space of D dimensions Gauss theorem leads to the conclusion that Coulomb field of point charge is proportional to 1/r(D-1) and thus the potential energy is proportional to 1/r(D-2). For D = 4 the potential energy is proportional to 1/r2. This potential when substituted in Shroedinger's equation leads to unstable solution. See Landau-Lifshitz Quantum Mechanics paragraph 35."Fall of a particle to the centre". Unstable solutions arising when D> 4."

I couldn't find any literature on this subject, and I have to say that from the book I could not derive such result.
Is it true for all 4 forces that loose their determinism in 3 dimensions, or just the coulomb (EM) force?
Is "particle falling to the center" a global example, that can represent all cases?
I was wondering if anybody can help on this.

For your help I will attach the specific pages of the book mentioned.
upload_2016-9-25_20-31-44.png


upload_2016-9-25_20-32-6.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-9-25_20-29-41.png
    upload_2016-9-25_20-29-41.png
    47 KB · Views: 510
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
D=4, not D=3. 4-dimensional space. Our universe is fine.

A 4-dimensional world leads to problems in Newtonian mechanics already: It means circular orbits are unstable, and every tiny deviation will lead to particles spiraling in, with unclear behavior for "hitting the center". It is not surprising that quantum mechanics has a problem with this as well.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top