Does static friction cause a car to move forward?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the role of static friction in the movement of a car and how it relates to forces acting on both the car and other objects, such as a box being pulled. Participants explore the mechanics of motion, including the interaction between tires and the ground, and the implications of Newton's laws of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that static friction prevents the tires from moving backwards and also contributes to the forward motion of the car.
  • Others argue that the force causing the car to move forward is the reaction force from the ground due to the tires pushing against it, as described by Newton's third law.
  • A participant suggests that the torque from the engine creates a force at the tire-road contact point, which, if within the limits of static friction, results in forward motion.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of static friction in relation to pulling objects, questioning whether it is part of the action-reaction pair or a result of sliding.
  • Some participants clarify that friction is an interaction between the ground and the object, and not part of the action-reaction pair with an external force like a person pulling a box.
  • One participant introduces the concept of angular momentum, suggesting that the forces involved in the car's motion also affect the Earth, although this remains a more complex consideration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of static friction in motion, with some asserting it is essential for forward movement while others emphasize the necessity of an external force. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference Newton's laws of motion but do not fully resolve the implications of these laws in the context of friction and movement. There are also distinctions made between static and kinetic friction that are not fully elaborated.

FisherDude
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I get that when a car moves forward, its tires are rotating backwards, but the static friction from the ground, as a reaction force to the force from the tires, prevents the tires from moving backwards (not sure on this). So does the static friction only prevent the tires from moving backwards, or does it actually make the tires (hence, the car) move forward?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FisherDude said:
I get that when a car moves forward, its tires are rotating backwards, but the static friction from the ground, as a reaction force to the force from the tires, prevents the tires from moving backwards (not sure on this). So does the static friction only prevent the tires from moving backwards, or does it actually make the tires (hence, the car) move forward?

Hi FisherDude! :smile:

A car moves forward because the engine forces the back axle to turn.

If the car was on ice, the back wheels would spin, but the rest of the car would be still.

The torque from the engine causes a force at the bit of the tyre in contact with the road. So long as that force does not exceed the maximum static friction, that force will equal the actual friction force, and the bit of the tyre in contact with the road will not move.

(Newton's first law on that bit of the tyre: zero total force means zero change in movement.)

The car will move, because the only external horizontal force on it is the actual friction force.

(Newton's second law on the car as a whole: net horizontal force means horizontal acceleration.)

So yes, the actual friction force prevents the tires from spinning, and also actually makes the car move forward. :smile:
 
Only an external force acting on the car can cause the car to move. (External meaning between the car and "something", where that something could be the ground, a wall, rocket exhaust, etc.).

So, the force acting on the car that causes it to move forward is the reaction force from the car pushing on the ground. This reaction force, described by Newton's third law, is due to the friction between the tire and the ground. Tire pushes on ground, ground pushes on car.
 
Ok, I think i understand it a little better...

how about when someone is pulling an object, such as a box, along a surface...is the static friction from the ground an actual reaction force to the force exerted by the person on the box? as in, is it part of the action-reaction pair, with the action being the force exerted by the person, or is the static friction just a result of the box sliding across the surface?

thanks btw!
 
If the "action" is the person pulling on the box, then the "reaction" is the box pulling back on the person. Similarly, the box exerts a friction force on the ground, thus the ground will exert a friction force on the box.

Friction is an interaction between the ground and the box, so it's not part of any "action-reaction" pair with the person. (And if the box is sliding, it will be kinetic friction, not static.)
 
In the case of the car, the tires exert a backwards force on the pavement, and the pavement exerts and equal and opposite forwards force on the tires, regardless of whether the tires are slipping (dynamic firction) or not (static friction), as long as the fricion isn't zero. The backwards force from the tires rotates the Earth backwards a bit, and the forwards force from the pavement accelerates the car around the surface of the earth. Angular momentum of Earth and car would be conserved if there was no aerodynamic drag.

In the case of the person pushing a box, the person exerts a backwards force to the floor which exerts an equal forwards force on the person. In a constant velocity situation, the person exerts a forwards force to the box, which in turn exerts a forwards force to the floor, and the floor exerts a backwards force on the box, and since there's no acceleration in this constant velocity case, all forces cancel. The work done by the person is converted into heat via dyamic friction between box and floor.
 
… friction can be your friend … !

FisherDude said:
how about when someone is pulling an object, such as a box, along a surface...is the static friction from the ground an actual reaction force to the force exerted by the person on the box? as in, is it part of the action-reaction pair, with the action being the force exerted by the person, or is the static friction just a result of the box sliding across the surface

Hi FisherDude! :cool:

This is very different from the friction on a wheel.

Friction on the wheel is the only force which makes the car move. Paradoxically, friction is the car-driver's friend! :smile:

But it is you pulling which makes the box move … friction on the box opposes your force. Friction is the box-puller's enemy! :mad:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K