Does sunscreen prevent tanning?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShawnD
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of sunscreen in preventing tanning. A high SPF, when applied correctly, can reduce tanning by blocking UV radiation, but it does not completely eliminate the risk of tanning or skin damage. The tanning response is influenced by individual genetics, meaning some people may tan more easily than others, even with sunscreen. While sunscreen acts as a protective barrier, it does not guarantee that tanning won't occur, especially for those with fair skin who may still tan despite using high SPF products. Blocking all UV radiation would prevent tanning entirely.
ShawnD
Science Advisor
Messages
715
Reaction score
2
Simple question with only a few possible answers: yes, no, sort of. If the answer is sort of, please explain how much it effects tanning.

I actually did try google searching before posting here :wink:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
If you apply a high enough SPF and apply it correctly, yes, it will prevent tanning. If you're tanning, the UV light is still getting to your skin to cause damage. Though, I'm one of those people with such fair skin that I burn very quickly in bright sun, which means I can put on SPF 50 and still get a tan, but it's still better than the sunburn I'd have without it.
 
Sunscreen

Sunsceens are just that - a screen. The SPF is a rating of how long you can stay in the sun for with a set amount of sunscreen on a set area of skin without causing reddening of the skin, but doesn't specifically relate to the tanning repsonse which is largely genetically determined (ie some people tan more than others, some burn more).

Obviously, if you block out all UV radiation the no tanning can occur.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top