B Does the Amplitude of White Noise Double When Two Samples are Added Together?

entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
Suppose you have two samples of white noise of equal amplitude. If you add them together ((sub)sample-by-(sub)sample that is), do you get one sample of white noise with twice the amplitude?

How about pink noise?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Both white and pink noise are defined by their Fourier transform (see http://applet-magic.com/spectrum1.htm), which is linear.

Suppose you have two time functions of white noise, f(t) and g(t). The Fourier transform of αf(t)+βg(t) is αFf+βFg = αcf+βcg, which is the Fourier transform of another white noise. So αf(t)+βg(t) is white noise.

Likewise, if f(t) and g(t) are pink noise, the Fourier transform of αf(t)+βg(t) is αFf+βFg = αcf/ω+βcg/ω = (αcf+βcg)/ω, which is the Fourier transform of another pink noise. So αf(t)+βg(t) is pink noise.
 
Last edited:
What does cf (and cg) mean? Is it a constant function? Is Ff (Fg) the Fourier spectrum?

My terminology may be faulty; I have enjoyed a scientific education, but I have never been particularly good at math...o_O
 
Sorry, I should have been more careful. If you look in the link I posted you will see that there are constants, c, in the Fourier transformation of white and pink noise. cf and cg are the constants associated with f and g. Ff and Fg are the Fourier transformations of f and g. (I could not get the LaTex script F to work immediately.)
 
If the noise sources are uncorrelated, they shouldn't have any fixed phase relation. I would expect the squared amplitudes to add, not the amplitudes.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
mfb said:
If the noise sources are uncorrelated, they shouldn't have any fixed phase relation. I would expect the squared amplitudes to add, not the amplitudes.
This is not a subject that I am expert at, but I think that means that the average powers sum.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top