Does the current speed matter when accelerating?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether the current speed of a biker affects the difficulty of accelerating by a fixed amount, specifically comparing increases from 10 kph to 15 kph versus from 20 kph to 25 kph. Participants explore the implications of energy formulas, power requirements, and practical experiences of cyclists, while neglecting air resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that it is indeed more difficult to increase speed from 20 kph to 25 kph than from 10 kph to 15 kph, based on energy formulas.
  • Others argue that cyclists may not notice the difference in effort required for acceleration at different speeds, suggesting that they may be focusing on maintaining a constant power output.
  • A participant notes that the effort perceived by cyclists may not account for the longer time required to accelerate from higher speeds.
  • One participant highlights that the power input required can be the same for both scenarios if the acceleration rates differ, suggesting that the experience of effort may vary based on acceleration strategy.
  • Another point raised is that at higher speeds, the torque delivered to the wheels is halved, which could affect the time taken to achieve the same incremental speed increase.
  • Wind resistance is mentioned as a factor that complicates the analysis, particularly since it increases with the cube of speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between current speed and the difficulty of acceleration, with no consensus reached. Some believe that the energy requirements dictate a difference in difficulty, while others emphasize the subjective experience of cyclists and their strategies for acceleration.

Contextual Notes

The discussion assumes neglect of air resistance, which may not reflect real-world conditions. Additionally, the varying strategies for acceleration among cyclists and the impact of gearing are not fully resolved.

shlosmem
Messages
47
Reaction score
2
Neglecting the air resistance, is it more difficult for a biker with a proper gearing in his bike, to increase his speed by 5 kph if his current speed is 20 kph rather then if his speed is 10 kph?
It seems that the answer is yes according to the energy formula but I've asked several bikers and they say they never notice it. So maybe I wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shlosmem said:
Neglecting the air resistance, is it more difficult for a biker with a proper gearing in his bike, to increase his speed by 5 kph if his current speed is 20 kph rather then if his speed is 10 kph?
It seems that the answer is yes according to the energy formula but I've asked several bikers and they say they never notice it. So maybe I wrong here?
It certainly takes more power to maintain a constant acceleration. Eventually you notice it because the bike cannot go any faster. That's partly the increasing resisting forces, but mainly the energy/power requirements.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shlosmem and etotheipi
shlosmem said:
I've asked several bikers and they say they never notice it. So maybe I wrong here?
That is the main reason bikes have gears. Don’t shift gears and I bet they will notice.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
shlosmem said:
Neglecting the air resistance, is it more difficult for a biker with a proper gearing in his bike, to increase his speed by 5 kph if his current speed is 20 kph rather then if his speed is 10 kph?
It seems that the answer is yes according to the energy formula but I've asked several bikers and they say they never notice it. So maybe I wrong here?
The issue is: what, exactly, are they "noticing"? Except in the beginning of a start from a complete stop, a bicyclist will tend to accelerate at constant power to avoid unnecessary fatigue. If they "notice" the "effort" (power) is the same, that's true. But maybe they aren't paying attention to/"noticing" that it takes much longer to accelerate from 20-25 than from 10-15.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shlosmem and Dale
It takes more fuel to go from 20 to 25 than 10 to 15, but how much fuel is left in the "tank" is not something noticeable at the moment you are accelerating.

The assumption that is missing from you hypothesis is how they accelerate. If the slower rider accelerates at, say, 2 kph/s (2.5 s to reach 15 kph) and the fast rider accelerates at 1 kph/s (5 s to reach 25 kph), then both will use the same power input (force times velocity). This means that - with appropriate gearing - the same effort (crankset torque and rpm) can propel both bikes. The only difference being that the fast rider will have to maintain it twice as long.

If the acceleration must be the same in both cases, then the fast rider will need twice the power and will obviously notice it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and shlosmem
A cyclist adopting a reasonably fixed cadence will be in twice as high a gear at 20 mph as at 10 mph. At a consistent effort, this means half the torque delivered to wheels rotating at twice the speed.

Gaining an incremental 5 miles per hour takes twice as long because the available torque is halved.

That is before one considers the effects of wind resistance -- which draws power as the cube of speed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K