Does the entropy of the universe as a whole change?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the universe can change its fundamental nature or break into pieces, with the consensus that the universe, by definition, encompasses everything and cannot cease to be the universe. It explores the relationship between entropy and the universe, noting that if the universe remains unchanged, its entropy would also remain constant. The conversation highlights the role of dark energy in the universe's expansion, which is accelerating and overcoming gravitational forces. Additionally, it touches on the concept of wave functions and the strong anthropic principle, suggesting that the universe observed by an individual is influenced by their specific causal interactions. Overall, the entropy of the universe is acknowledged to be continuously increasing, complicating the application of thermodynamic principles to the universe as a whole.
friend
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
9
Does the universe as a whole ever change from being the universe as a whole? Does it ever break into pieces and cease being the universe?

And if anything (like the universe) never changed its state, wouldn't that mean its entropy never changed? Are there any constant thermodynamic properties that can be assigned to the universe as a whole?
 
Science news on Phys.org
No. Why would you expect the universe to "break into pieces". Besides "universe" means "everything there is, so the pieces would STILL be the universe (but it's still a non-starter).
 
I'm thinking of how the universe may be getting bigger at the same time gravity is drawing things together. Wouldn't gravity have a tendency to counteract the entropy of expansion?
 
friend said:
I'm thinking of how the universe may be getting bigger at the same time gravity is drawing things together. Wouldn't gravity have a tendency to counteract the entropy of expansion?
I have no idea what you mean. Dark Energy (whatever it is) has made it so that no only is the universe expanding, the rate of expansion is accelerating. Gravity was overcome some 5 billion years ago. Your late.
 
  • Like
Likes bhillyard
Or, as I understand it, wave functions are unitary and conserve information. So if we were to write a wave function for the entire universe, what else besides the universe would the universe interact with to collapse the entire universe? If nothing, then the information content of the universe would remain constant, right?
 
The wave function of the entire universe need not collapse all. The portion of the universe which is in causal contact with you collapses via interacting with you, hence, you observe a universe that is comparable with your existence. This is called the "strong anthropic principal". It is by no means a widely agreed upon principal but it is something you might be interested in learning about.

Entropy of the universe is always increasing.

Thermodynamic principals are a bit hard to apply to the universe as a whole. If you define the universe as everything that is in causal contact then the universe consists of everything within a certain radius of a chosen object. Your universe and my universe are different because each of us is at the center of a slightly different sphere. Discussing the universe as a whole cannot be done without reference to the things within it, such as a high red-shift galaxy for example. But if we discus a high red-shift galaxy we have to acknowledge that, being in the center of a different sphere, it is in causal contact with things that we are not, and not in causal contact with things that we are.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top