Does the Existence of lim f(x)g(x) Imply the Existence of lim f(x) and lim g(x)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter babita
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Properties
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the existence of the limit of the product of two functions, lim x→0 [f(x)g(x)], implies the existence of the individual limits lim x→0 f(x) and lim x→0 g(x). The consensus is that the statement is false; the product limit can exist even if one or both of the individual limits do not. A counterexample is needed to illustrate this point, as the product of two functions can converge while their individual limits diverge. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the treatment of limits involving infinity and zero, emphasizing the importance of proper limit notation to avoid misunderstandings. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately solving limit problems in calculus.
babita
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the ques says:
lim x tending to 0 [f(x)g(x)] exists. Then both lim x tending to 0 f(x) AND lim x tending to 0 also exist. True or False

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


lim f(x)g(x) =lim f(x) * lim g(x)
so if LHS exists then limf(x) and lim g(x) must exist
so it should be true
but the answer says that the statement is false
pleasezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
babita said:

Homework Statement



the ques says:
lim x tending to 0 [f(x)g(x)] exists. Then both lim x tending to 0 f(x) AND lim x tending to 0 also exist. True or False

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


lim f(x)g(x) =lim f(x) * lim g(x)
so if LHS exists then limf(x) and lim g(x) must exist
so it should be true
but the answer says that the statement is false
pleasezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz help

$$\lim_{x \to 0} f(x)g(x) = \lim_{x \to 0}f(x)\cdot \lim_{x \to 0} g(x)$$
only if both limits on the right side exist.

What you need is a counterexample in which the limits on the right side fail to exist, but the limit of the product does exist.
 
got it, thanks:)
please help me out on this one also:
i was doing limits and i noticed that while 1/ ∞ and -1/ ∞ both are taken as 0
the author writes 1/0 as + ∞ and -1/0 as -∞
please explain...
 
i understand that -0 and +0 would mean same and -∞ and +∞ mean different
but I'm getting some answers wrong. (and I'm getting confused)
for eg: xsin(1/x)here if x tends to -∞ it would be sin(-1/ ∞)/-1/ ∞
so shouldn't the answer be 1? the book says -1
 
babita said:
got it, thanks:)
please help me out on this one also:
i was doing limits and i noticed that while 1/ ∞ and -1/ ∞ both are taken as 0
the author writes 1/0 as + ∞ and -1/0 as -∞
You'll need to show me what the author is actually saying. Both 1/0 and -1/0 are undefined, and a limit that has one of these forms can turn out to be ∞, -∞, or fail to exist completely.

Some examples:
##\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{1}{x}## does not exist
##\lim_{x \to 0^+}\frac{1}{x} = \infty##
##\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{-1}{x^2} = -\infty##
 
And how I'm wrong here:
xsin(1/x)here if x tends to -∞ it would be sin(-1/ ∞)/-1/ ∞
so shouldn't the answer be 1?
 
babita said:
And how I'm wrong here:
xsin(1/x)here if x tends to -∞ it would be sin(-1/ ∞)/-1/ ∞
so shouldn't the answer be 1?
Yes, but you should never write expressions such as sin(-1/∞) and the like. That's what limits are for.
 
babita said:
And how I'm wrong here:
xsin(1/x)here if x tends to -∞ it would be sin(-1/ ∞)/-1/ ∞
so shouldn't the answer be 1?
As Mark44 said, you should never write things like "1/0", 1/\infty, or 1/-\infty. To find the limit of x sin(1/x) as x goes to -\infty, let y= 1/x so we have \lim_{y\to 0^-} sin(y)/y. That can be easily shown (how depending on exactly how you have defined sine) to be 1.
 
i understand that...just wrote it to explain what i was thinking
thanks
 
Back
Top