Does the Order of insulating layers matter?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kaguro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of the order of insulating layers on heat transfer in a system with a defined heat capacity. Participants explore whether the arrangement of two insulating layers, one a poor conductor and the other a better conductor, affects the final temperature of the system when exposed to a lower temperature environment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the thermal inertia of the insulating layers A and B is significant or if it is primarily the thermal inertia of the system that matters.
  • Another participant asks what the outcomes would be if the heat capacities of layers A and B are negligible versus significant.
  • A participant suggests that the shape of the boundary may not matter, arguing that heat transfer should depend on the exposed surface area rather than the shape.
  • In a cylindrical configuration, a participant notes that if the thermal inertias of the insulating layers are negligible, the order of the layers affects the rate of heat transfer due to differences in resistance and surface area.
  • One participant introduces a scenario involving materials with temperature-dependent thermal conductivities, suggesting that the arrangement of these materials could lead to different cooling rates based on their properties near specific temperatures.
  • Mathematical expressions are provided to illustrate how the heat transfer rates differ based on the order of the layers and their thermal conductivities, with a focus on cylindrical conditions and the implications of layer arrangement on heat transfer efficiency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of layer order and material properties, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus on the matter.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific geometric conditions and mathematical formulations, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the significance of heat capacities and the effects of boundary shapes on heat transfer.

Kaguro
Messages
221
Reaction score
57
TL;DR
If a system is covered by two layers of different heat conductivities, would their order matter in how much net heat is lost?
Given a system with some heat capacity. It is at any temperature T, and it is covered by two layers A and B. Say layer A is poor conductor of heat and B is comparatively better.

If we let the system sit in a matrix of lower temperature for some time (long enough for heat to pass through A but not long enough that our system comes in equilibrium with the surrounding temperature..), does the final temperature of system depend on ordering of layers A and B?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Are you saying that the thermal inertial of A and B is significant, or just the thermal inertia of the system? Is the boundary of the system flat (slab) or is the boundary curved?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
I would like to know what happens with each of the cases you mentioned.

First let's consider that the heat capacities of A and B are not significant. What in that case?

And if their heat capacities are significant, then what?

Also, why would the shape of the boundary matter here? The heat released should be proportional to the exposed surface area and not on the shape.
 
Let's say the system is a cylinder (i.e., curved surface), and the thicknesses of the insulating layers are equal, and on the same order as the radius of the pipe. Then, in the case where the thermal inertias of the insulating layers are negligible, the same amount of heat flows through the insulating layers per unit time, but the inner layer has more resistance, because the heat is distributed over a smaller average surface area. So, switching the order of the layers will affect the rate of heat transfer. OK so far?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
If I am trying to keep in, at say 20 C, and outside it's 0 C, suppose one material X has a high heat transmission near 20 C and low everywhere else, and the other Y has a high heat transmission near 0 C and low everywhere else. If I have X near the interior and Y near the exterior it will cool faster than the reverse.

However, such materials are unusual and laboratory curiosities. They usually (possibly always) involve a phase change.

Google "heat diode" for more.

Apart from this, @Chestermiller is right - geometry is the driving factor.
 
Given geometric conditions of equality on a flat surface

[tex]A_1 = A_2 = A[/tex]

Y

[tex]x_1 = x_2 = x[/tex]

For the same temperature difference the inversion of the layers results in the same rate of transfer of energy or heat.

[tex]Q = \dfrac {A (T_i-T_e) k_1k_2}{x (k_1 + k_2)} = \dfrac {A (T_i-T_e) \mu}{x}[/tex]

[tex]\mu = \dfrac {k_1k_2}{k_1 + k_2} = \dfrac {1}{\dfrac {1}{k_1} + \dfrac {1}{k_2}}[/tex]

The difference lies in the fact that the temperature at the junction interface between materials is subjected to different temperatures, tm is higher if the material with the highest thermal conductivity is the one exposed to the source of the highest temperature.

heattransfer.png


But in cylindrical condition

[tex]R_ {avg1} = R_i + \dfrac {x}{2}[/tex]

[tex]R_ {avg2} = R_i + \dfrac {3x}{2}[/tex]

[tex]A_1 \cong2 \pi R_ {avg1} L[/tex]

[tex]A_2 \cong2 \pi R_ {avg2} L[/tex]

[tex]A_2> A_1[/tex]

[tex]e = R_i + x-R_i = R_i + 2x- (R_i + x) = x[/tex]

then if the material with the highest conductivity is internal

[tex]k_1> k_2[/tex]

if the material with the highest conductivity is in the inner layer

[tex]Q_A = \dfrac {T_i-T_e}{x} \dfrac {k_1 A_1 k_2 A_2}{k_1A_1 + k_2A_2}[/tex]

if the material with the highest conductivity is in the outer layer

[tex]Q_B = \dfrac {T_i-T_e}{x} \dfrac {k_1 A_1 k_2 A_2}{k_1A_2 + k_2A_1}[/tex]

If we make the ratio of both equations

[tex]\dfrac {Q_A}{Q_B} = \dfrac{k_1A_2 + k_2A_1}{k_1A_1 + k_2A_2}[/tex]

Replacing what their surfaces are worth

[tex]\dfrac {Q_A}{Q_B} = \dfrac {k_1 (R_i + \dfrac {3x}{2}) + k_2 (R_i + \dfrac {x}{2})}{k_1 (R_i + \dfrac {x}{2}) + k_2 (R_i + \dfrac {3x}{2})}[/tex]

Distributing and ordering

[tex]\dfrac {Q_A}{Q_B} = \dfrac {(k_1 + k_2) R_i + \dfrac {x}{2} (k_1 + k_2 + 2k_1)}{(k_1 + k_2) R_i + \dfrac {x}{ 2} (k_1 + k_2 + 2k_2)}[/tex]

So if [tex]k_1> k_2[/tex] is satisfied

It follows that [tex]\dfrac {Q_A}{Q_B}> 1[/tex]

Then [tex]Q_A> Q_B[/tex] there is a better transfer rate if the smallest surface area is the one with the highest conductivity and is in contact with the hottest fluid
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 135 ·
5
Replies
135
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K