Does the Right Hand Rule Determine Current Direction Without Acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the right-hand rule to determine current direction in a magnetic field without acceleration. The user is trying to confirm if the current flows from point x to point y based on their application of the rule, with their thumb indicating the direction of current. It is noted that if the solenoid is moving at a constant speed, there should be no force acting on it, raising questions about the right-hand rule's applicability in this scenario. Additionally, the complexity of magnetic fields, particularly around a horseshoe magnet versus parallel plates, is highlighted, emphasizing the need for clarity in the setup of motion and geometry. The conversation suggests that understanding the context and geometry is crucial for accurately applying the right-hand rule.
Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
ameter.jpg

Just need to know if current goes from x to y or y to x.
using right hand rule with my thumb pointing towards y and my fingers pointing down (in direction of flux lines) and my palm pointing in direction of force which is straight into the magnet indicates current is in the direction of my thumb.
Is that correct?
Also, since f=m x a and the solenoid is being moved in at a constant speed (no acceleration) that means there should be no force.
Does this mean the right hand rule can't be used in this situation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
magnetic fields are not linear in all space from a horse shoe magnet. So it will react to the gradient, or the change in flux.
Trying to understand your drawing.
If that is not a horseshoe magnet, but two parallel plates, ignoring edge effects,
well
\bigtriangledown \times E = -\frac{\delta B}{\delta t} so you need a moving magnetic field.
Maybe just explain your problem better, and set up the motion and geometry properly.
 
Last edited:

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Determining the direction of an induced current
Replies
10
Views
2K
Induced Current Direction in a Changing Magnetic Field
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fleming's left and right hand rule - how do they work?
Replies
8
Views
3K
How does an eddy current brake work exactly?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Direction and magnitude of electric field produced by current change
Replies
8
Views
984
Right-Hand Rule: Finding Induced Direction in a One Loop Wire on the Page
Replies
5
Views
2K
Direction of the induced current from an OCR paper -- concept question
Replies
9
Views
2K
Direction of current as bar magnet moves uniformly through copper ring
Replies
3
Views
1K
What is the direction of the current in the given image?
Replies
18
Views
3K
Magnetic field generated by an infinitely long current-carrying wire
Replies
43
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top