Medical Does the Same Lens Work for Different Vision Strengths?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neden
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the differences in vision between two individuals when viewing a screen through a camera. One participant argues that both should see the same quality image on the camera screen due to the camera's ability to focus the image, while the other contends that individual eyesight differences will still affect how each person perceives the image. The key point is that, although the camera captures a clear image, each person's ability to focus on the screen at a close distance varies based on their unique vision conditions. Even with the camera's correction, individual eyesight discrepancies mean that both individuals will not perceive the image with the same clarity. The camera's focus on the image does not compensate for the different visual needs of each viewer when looking at the camera screen.
neden
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
vision problem! who's right?

http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/8756/55201759.gif

I don't know if this is a stupid question but one day me and my friend were talking and we got into an argument about viewing a screen through a camera's phone and a phoropter with the same lense in both. Suppose that the lense is perfect for my eyesight and suppose that we have completely different strength in eyesight; I cannot see objects clearly without my glasses but he can. So when we visit the optometrist office and try to view images under that very same lense, it is suitable for me but not for him. Now in the case of viewing the screen under a camera, would it yield the same result? My friend insists that yes because in this case we will both be able to visualize the images on the display screen on the camera at the same quality because we are both viewing images under the same specifications set by the camera and because of this, therefore our eyes do not need to adjust at all because the camera does all the conversion behind the scenes.

So who's right? He says under the camera we will see the same thing but I say we won't because the lense should only work for me (since if it never worked for him in the optometrist's office it will not work on a camera's screen), I am no physicists but can anyone kindly explain this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org


The camera focuses the image on a chip, so it takes care of the long-distance-focusing for both of you.

Now whether you can see the image clearly on the camera screen or not depends on how well your eyes can focus on small distances.

Some people can focus better on long distances than on short ones, and vice versa.
 


It depends on how bad your visions is (assuming you're near sighted). From the proprortions in your picture, for instance, at that distance, I wouldn't be able to make out what was on the camera/cellphone, so you'd be correct if the cell phone is really that far away. If you and your friend both held the phone close to your faces, so that you overcame the astigmatism, then your friend would be correct, neither of you have to use your long-distance focus when the screen is right there.
 


So basically now whatever I view on the camera at that specific lense that may turn out to be perfect for my vision does it also mean that it will also perfectly work for him? The answer is no, right? Even though the camera has done all the work for us, we still have our own subtle differences in eyesight.

Basically what I'm trying to say is that even after the camera has done all the work for us, we both still won't be seeing the same thing on the camera (the camera will not correct both our visions at the same time thus we will not be seeing the image with the same visual quality; the answer seems trivial but I just want to get that through my head).
 


The camera focuses a perfect picture on its chip from a distance d1 (camera - object). The "perfection" of this picture is completely independent of anyone's eyesight.

Now when you look at the picture on the camera, your eyes have to focus a new distance d2 that is much smaller than the distance d1 of the real object. The situation is now completely independent of d1. The details of the picture on the camera screen are focused by your eyesight exactly as if they were details of the camera casing, buttons, brand name label, tripod, or the finger nails from the hands that are holding it.
 


Thank you, that particular explanation makes sense.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top