Does the shortest distance exists?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harmony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shortest distance
Harmony
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Is there a shortest possible distance besides zero? Or there's no limitation at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Harmony said:
Is there a shortest possible distance besides zero? Or there's no limitation at all?
Good question. Check out my discussion of it http://thisquantumworld.com/topdown.htm" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Harmony said:
Is there a shortest possible distance besides zero? Or there's no limitation at all?

Strictly mathematically, both of your alternatives appear to be incorrect.

There is always a smaller nonzero distance -- just keep dividing by two.

There is also a limit: zero.


But is there a smallest meaningful nonzero distance? That is, some distance that no possible event can occur over a smaller distance, no matter how little time it takes?

Sure. That's called a Planck Length. Planck units are the "smallest meaningful" amounts of anything. Planck time is the smallest meaningful amount of time -- nothing can occur in less time, for example.

The Planck Length is something like 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000016 meters.

That's how far a photon traveling at c will travel in one unit of Planck Time. A proton is about 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 Planck Length units across.

Is there a distance shorter than one Planck Length? Can't you just divide that by two, and so on? Not meaningfully, no. You can conceive of a smaller length philosophically in your head, but that cannot express a valid measurement in the real world.
 
What will happen when a matter travel for a distance equal to Planck Length? The matter can't travel for any distance between Plack Length and zero, can it?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top