Does this limit exist lim e^(r^2)/(cos(t)sin(t)) for (r,t)->(0,0)

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The limit of the expression e^(r^2)/(cos(t)sin(t)) as (r,t) approaches (0,0) does not exist because the denominator approaches zero while the numerator approaches one, leading to an undefined situation. The reasoning that both components grow without bounds is insufficient for determining limit existence; the overall behavior of the function must be considered. The second limit, sin(xy)/(xy) as (x,y) approaches (0,0), is correctly evaluated by substituting xy with u, resulting in a limit of 1. This substitution simplifies the problem to a single variable limit, which is a valid method. Overall, the first limit does not exist, while the second limit exists and equals 1.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
In my exam the question was to determine the existence of this limit
\lim_{(r,t)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{e^{r^2}}{\cos{t}\sin{t}}

now i wrote the numerator has no t associated with it so grows or shrinks without bounds, the same applies for the denominator...
so the limit does not exist

is this a good reason

another question was
\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{\sin{xy}}{xy}
i substituted xy = u and got \lim_{u \rightarrow 0} \frac{\sin{u}}{u} = 1


is this the correct method?
Am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The numerator does not "grow or shrink without bound". As r goes to 0, the numerator goes to 1.

However, you are correct that the denominator goes to 0 as t does no matter what r is. Since the numerator goes to 1, what does that tell you about the fraction?

I was a bit suspicious about your second method, but yes, it works, since u is a variable, you are not assuming any relationship between x and y.
 


Your reasoning for the first limit is not entirely correct. While it is true that the numerator and denominator both grow without bounds as (r,t) approaches (0,0), this does not necessarily mean that the limit does not exist. In order to determine the existence of a limit, you need to consider the behavior of the function as a whole, not just the individual components. In this case, as (r,t) approaches (0,0), the function becomes oscillatory, with the numerator and denominator both approaching 0. This type of behavior can lead to the existence of a limit. However, in this case, the function is not well-defined at (0,0) since the denominator becomes 0, so the limit does not exist.

Your approach for the second limit is correct. By substituting xy=u, you are essentially reducing the problem to a single variable limit, which can be evaluated using standard techniques. In this case, the limit evaluates to 1, so you are correct in saying that the limit exists and is equal to 1.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top