Does this make any sense at all? Surface Area/Integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement

Let's say I have a parametric surface \mathbf{r}(u,v) = <x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v)>

Let's say I have to solve some surface integral

\iint f(x,y,z)\;dS

Can I do this differential?

dS = |\mathbf{r_u} \times \mathbf{r_v}|dA

also, has anyone noticed how small LaTeX has gotten on PF?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
flyingpig said:

Homework Statement




Let's say I have a parametric surface \mathbf{r}(u,v) = <x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v)>

Let's say I have to solve some surface integral

\iint f(x,y,z)\;dS

Can I do this differential?

dS = |\mathbf{r_u} \times \mathbf{r_v}|dA

also, has anyone noticed how small LaTeX has gotten on PF?

What do you mean 'can I do it'? If the r_u and r_v are partial derivatives and dA means du*dv, then that's an expression for dS alright.
 
flyingpig said:
Let's say I have a parametric surface \mathbf{r}(u,v) = <x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v)>

Let's say I have to solve some surface integral

\iint f(x,y,z)\;dS

Can I do this differential?

dS = |\mathbf{r_u} \times \mathbf{r_v}|dA


absolutely
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top